No Kings need quality assets coming back,its not just about cap.Kings arent rebuilding their retooling and their not giving away players like Martinez or Muzzin without quality compensation coming back.
Who the **** is Patterson?
It's part of a larger deal, but that's what the rumor mill is saying.
It's about cap relief for the kings, rutta comes off the books after This year and if Seabrook is moved then moving rutta for a upgrade helps both Chicago and la .
Moving third liners around accomplishes nothing. Its time both face reality and gut the majority of their teams. Keep Kane/Toews & Kopitar/Doughty to build around and sell/buyout the rest.
Your indignation is so cute!How many 1sts?
It doesn’t matter what the answer is.
So Chicago gives up an average defenseman with a terrible contract for the likely rookie of the year. Makes sense.
Yeah but the kings aren't in a position cap wise to bargain.
That's just horriawful.Their has been rumors for 2 or 3 weeks , and Seabrook has been mentioned . This would be a larger deal , Stan wants gagner and Patterson and Seabrook either a 1stmor 2nd and maybe anisomov with Vancouver taking salary back.
lol did someone really suggest Elias Pettersson and stuff for Seabrook???????? And the Canucks take back salary???
I heard it was Eriksson and Gagner for Chicago’s 1st.It sounds like Seabrook is getting moved , I heard either Vancouver for gagner and Patterson or Edmonton he is going to.
I also believe Crawford gets moved as well .
Rutta will have to go with murphy coming back.
Whoever your hearing this from is full of lies. No chance Van moves him period, let alone for junk.
Good point. Plus Vancouver needs defenseYou think Vancouver is going to get a 3 time cup winner without giving up a piece?
Who the **** is Patterson?
A "piece" does not mean Elias Pettersson. He is about as untouchable as anyone in the league right now. Seabrook is worth a 4th or 5th at best with that albatross contract and his diminishing play.You think Vancouver is going to get a 3 time cup winner without giving up a piece?
No interest in that deal at all.Martinez
Kempe
For
Saad
Nordgren
why not just trade muzzin as he is a asset they can move at the deadline.........I dont think LA would necessarily want Ruuta...its just getting another asset that they can move at the trade deadline. Then also getting the pick, hopefully a 2nd, to help their future.
Chicago would need to move some cap back.
I dont see Chicago moving a 1st round pick for Muzzin...he is just not worth that right now.
lol did someone really suggest Elias Pettersson and stuff for Seabrook???????? And the Canucks take back salary???
Please, we'll take him for Mark Lazerus. Anything to get that useless hack off Blackhawks writing and to stop hearing his ignorant and mindless ramblingsThere's a reporter named Jeff Paterson who covers the Canucks, but I'm not sure we can really send him to Chicago.