go4hockey
Registered User
Why would you want Rutta? He's terrible.
He is not a King fan and there is so much fake in his post.
Why would you want Rutta? He's terrible.
It sounds like Seabrook is getting moved , I heard either Vancouver for gagner and Patterson or Edmonton he is going to.
I also believe Crawford gets moved as well .
Rutta will have to go with murphy coming back.
I dont think LA would necessarily want Ruuta...its just getting another asset that they can move at the trade deadline. Then also getting the pick, hopefully a 2nd, to help their future.
Chicago would need to move some cap back.
I dont see Chicago moving a 1st round pick for Muzzin...he is just not worth that right now.
Seabrook to Edmonton. Sure, pal. Unless Chicago is taking Lucic and Sekera back for cap purposes. Not gonna happen.It sounds like Seabrook is getting moved , I heard either Vancouver for gagner and Patterson or Edmonton he is going to.
I also believe Crawford gets moved as well .
Rutta will have to go with murphy coming back.
Excuse me, who? Do you mean Pettersson? And if so, do you think that's funny?
Chicago will either give up a 1st or 2nd in that deal, Vancouver would be taking salary back.
Source?
It sounds like Seabrook is getting moved , I heard either Vancouver for gagner and Patterson or Edmonton he is going to.
I also believe Crawford gets moved as well .
Rutta will have to go with murphy coming back.
They are reporting about Ganger, I see nothing about Seabrook.Second city is reporting.. and their has been rumors over the past 2 or 3 weeks and Seabrook name is in everyone of those . It sounds like a larger deal between Chicago and Vancouver. The word is either Thursday night or Friday a.m if a deal happens that's when everyone will know.
Chicago will either give up a 1st or 2nd in that deal, Vancouver would be taking salary back.
Who the hell is Patterson? I honestly have no idea who you mean. There is no way you mean E. Pettersson, nobody in their sane mind can actually believe that Pettersson for Seabrook is a fair deal.
It's part of a larger deal, but that's what the rumor mill is saying.
Then Chicago should look elsewhere for defense.Kings don't want your garbage for a top 4 defensemen.I dont think LA would necessarily want Ruuta...its just getting another asset that they can move at the trade deadline. Then also getting the pick, hopefully a 2nd, to help their future.
Chicago would need to move some cap back.
I dont see Chicago moving a 1st round pick for Muzzin...he is just not worth that right now.
They are reporting about Ganger, I see nothing about Seabrook.
Their has been rumors for 2 or 3 weeks , and Seabrook has been mentioned . This would be a larger deal , Stan wants gagner and Patterson and Seabrook either a 1stmor 2nd and maybe anisomov with Vancouver taking salary back.
Then Chicago should look elsewhere for defense.Kings don't want your garbage for a top 4 defensemen.
It's about cap relief for the kings, rutta comes off the books after This year and if Seabrook is moved then moving rutta for a upgrade helps both Chicago and la .
No Kings need quality assets coming back,its not just about cap.Kings arent rebuilding their retooling and their not giving away players like Martinez or Muzzin without quality compensation coming back.It's about cap relief for the kings, rutta comes off the books after This year and if Seabrook is moved then moving rutta for a upgrade helps both Chicago and la .
Do you mean Eriksson? Seabrook for Gagne and Eriksson?Their has been rumors for 2 or 3 weeks , and Seabrook has been mentioned . This would be a larger deal , Stan wants gagner and Patterson and Seabrook either a 1stmor 2nd and maybe anisomov with Vancouver taking salary back.
Their has been rumors for 2 or 3 weeks , and Seabrook has been mentioned . This would be a larger deal , Stan wants gagner and Patterson and Seabrook either a 1stmor 2nd and maybe anisomov with Vancouver taking salary back.