He's had 1 year that the injury bug got him. Why is this like attached to him now? Seems really strange to me.What changes first? Cozens luck Or Mittelstadts ability to stay healthy?
I’ll vote on the luck
He's not the only one that has been called injury prone after one injury.He's had 1 year that the injury bug got him. Why is this like attached to him now? Seems really strange to me.
Mitts has almost all the points at PP, at ES he seems to have only 4 points in 23 games.Looking pretty one-sided on the ice at this point, even though it's only a 5 point difference. The +13 goal differential is noteworthy.
I don't believe it's possible to play so bad even with Olofsson and other players who were constantly on his lane (Krebs, Asplund, Hino). I think the problem is that nor Mitts nor Olofsson are just good, even if for different reasons, but as they are.Cozens has certainly broken out and looks the part.
Mitts…is still a bit in limbo. We need to fix his line, but I think he has played decent enough as to where he isn’t the problem. But it’s the misfit line and not working
If wishes were f***ing horses…..Voted Mitts because I think Dallas will be heavily invested in his success and will be relying on him to fill the void left by Robertson.
It's a long season. Mittelstadt still has time to pull ahead.
That right there has played a big role in the take off for Cozens. Those three have such a great mix of skills that mesh perfectly together.Totally. But as I said in the OP, it's not just about points. Cozens and his wingers are flying and generating tons of chances, which then prevents time in the d-zone.
i thought that too... even in his rookie seaason he had a good shot, injured? lack of confidence?I just don't have the faith in Mitts to be an impactful player that I once had. He's not really playing bad or anything but I don't see the high offensive upside I thought he had. What's with him never using his shot?