That's what I don't see with this team. The ability to get in center ice, between the dots for scoring chances which is the prime scoring area.
I agree with this. I'll agree it's coached too- so the question becomes, if Peters ran the offense like Toronto or Tampa Bay, would they be better than they are now?
Maybe?
One issue, off the top of my head, is that the Hurricanes almost don't have a guy sitting in the middle of the ice waiting to receive a pass as often as other teams- and if they do, the low hockey IQ winger won't see him (Williams missing Lindholm and McGinn doing the above multiple times against Edmonton, for example- I can't imagine that this is a coaching issue). The center of the ice is the farthest away from the boards, and the 'Canes wingers are average to weak on the boards- so the idea being, they can't afford to have a guy basically take himself out of the play on the boards for a scoring opportunity. And if it did, so what? Rask is one thing, I think he could score 30 in Tampa or Toronto just waiting for the pass in the slot, but Staal or Ryan? Why bother?
A second issue is that the Hurricanes almost never attempt , and thus, convert, on a major redirect from the dead slot on an extreme angle, by which I mean pointman is aiming for the corner board and hoping a guy in the slot will redirect it 45 degrees. It seems to me the focus is for the shot to be on net, with the redirect out in front and a guy (ostensibly) waiting to bang in the rebound.
(The main difference between the 'Canes and the Leafs and Bolts goes without saying)
Per Naturalstattrick, the Canes have a HDCF/60 that is 5th best in the NHL and Toronto's is 9th, so that measure would say the Canes are better. I look at these two charts and see the exact opposite. Almost all of the Leafs shots are in the prime scoring areas. The Canes are really close to the goalie (which isn't always prime scoring) or off to the side, but there's a complete empty in the slot, which is the prime scoring area.
C'mon BBA. You can't call shots in the slot prime scoring opportunities while hedging that shots 3 feet from the net aren't "always" prime scoring.
So shots that your stat says are high quality chances often aren't.
I'm interested to see if there's data suggesting that slot shots are *significantly* better than what the 'Canes under Peters are producing.
(Now, if you want to say that Peters' system isn't conductive, like, at all, to getting shots from the slot? Sure, but we can parse over whether that's the only valuable shot to take)
I mean, a Stamkos/Matthews/Nylander/Kucherov slot shot? Yeah, but the 'Canes don't have that kind of player, AINEC.
Yes, but I think the clear expectation was that he would move to wing as a pro.
I mean, he was drafted and broke into the League when one of the Hurricanes' many problems was a 2nd line center behind Staal ("not since Matt Cullen left...."). I don't think it's a coincidence that Skinner-to-center died around the time the 'Canes acquired Jordan, and I don't think it's a coincidence that Aho-to-center is an issue now that the 'Canes have an even worse center problem.