So basically Ovechkin had a shot at scoring like Kucherov, and that means Bure is better when Ovechkin was clearly better offensively than Bure?
Possibly, the question is peak though. At the same time I'm wondering if Kucherov's 128 point season is somewhat of an anomaly and not entirely suggestive of his actual level of play, because it sticks out like a sore thumb from his next best seasons.
Not quite. He was the 3rd best skater on his team, even his regular linemate Point was better.
Through the first 2-3 rounds he arguably was, although Malkin dominated against Carolina, and then in the finals Lidstrom/Zetterberg shutdown Crosby and Malkin ran wild. I would give it to Malkin since even if the roles were reversed best case scenario their points would flip flop. Point played on the same line and drove the play more, was better defensively, had way more goals (twice as many in 2 less games) and even besides that had a higher points per game anyway.
Sure but use my hypothesis for a 3 year sample only then (or whatever one might use as a peak) the point still stands.
I agree with this and people often conveniently forget about this.
It seems that the Red Wings thought Crosby was better and took their chances with Malkin.