Value of: Best Offer (any) for these Canuck Players to your team

[Hockey Rush]

Didn't want to bring Tanev up as the OP left him out, but since he's now part of the conversation...
Toronto
Tanev

Vancouver
1st
2nd
2nd/prospect

I left Tanev out because his trade speculation between Vancouver and Toronto would just send this topic into a black hole of bickering between Tanev's value/injury history lol.

Your offer is more generous then most Leaf fans tho so I respect that offer.

 

[Hockey Rush]

19 and a 3rd in 2019 is our best offer.

I believe Vancouver fans are starting to really appreciate Tanev's value more than before. I would say that is probably pretty fair value given the 19 is not a late 1st in the 23-31 range. If the third was a second I see next to no real roadblocks in it all. Do you guys have any right-handed D prospect or promising top 6 LWer you could toss in or swap out the 3rd for? Vancouver is really hurting for a right handed D man and a top line LWer. I would imagine we address one of those needs this draft with the 7th overall. (even if that is a wahlstrom a RWer at 7)

 

[elitepete]

40th OA for Baer?

Done deal.

 

[Chainshot]

With Demko looking right on the verge, is Markstrom possibly available and at what sort of cost?

 

[sting101]

19 and a 3rd in 2019 is our best offer.

what do you do when he accepts?

 

[member 157595]

I left Tanev out because his trade speculation between Vancouver and Toronto would just send this topic into a black hole of bickering between Tanev's value/injury history lol.

Your offer is more generous then most Leaf fans tho so I respect that offer.

Leaving out the homers on both sides I know in my heart there's a deal to be made between our two teams for Tanev. Tanev is a perfect partner for Morgan Rielly (when healthy) and we have pieces that could help a Vancouver rebuild.

 

[Canuck Luck]

With Demko looking right on the verge, is Markstrom possibly available and at what sort of cost?

Ideally we keep him over Nilsson but hey make an offer and we would listen

 

[JuniorNelson]

Ideally we keep him over Nilsson but hey make an offer and we would listen

Ideally Canucks get a veteran starter who doesn't have issues to mentor Demko. Is Markstrom going to show Demko how to achieve anything?

 

[nuckfan insk]

40th for Baertschi is fair.

I’d like to see what would be offered for
Granlund
Gagner
Baertschi
Tanev
Guddy
Edler
Nilsson
Sutter

If any reasonable deals for these guys were available it might be best to move on

 

[rt]

How are Vancouver fans feeling about Gagner? Would you be willing to retain salary and move him for a very small return? For example, would a 2019 7th rounder for Gagner at 50% retention be tempting? Or would the pick have to be higher and/or the retention lower?

 

[dayner]

How are Vancouver fans feeling about Gagner? Would you be willing to retain salary and move him for a very small return? For example, would a 2019 7th rounder for Gagner at 50% retention be tempting? Or would the pick have to be higher and/or the retention lower?

For that you might as well keep him, put him in a better position to succeed this year and offload him at the TDL

 

[Liferleafer]

40th for Baertschi is fair.

I’d like to see what would be offered for
Granlund
Gagner
Baertschi
Tanev
Guddy
Edler
Nilsson
Sutter

If any reasonable deals for these guys were available it might be best to move on

1st+2nd+2nd/prospect for Tanev.

 

[rt]

For that you might as well keep him, put him in a better position to succeed this year and offload him at the TDL

So higher pick and/or lower retention? What's the happy medium for you?

 

[rt]

For that you might as well keep him, put him in a better position to succeed this year and offload him at the TDL

So higher pick and/or lower retention? What's the happy medium for you?

 

[Canadian Canuck]

So higher pick and/or lower retention? What's the happy medium for you?

I’d take a 4th for Gagner 50% retained and Gagner 25% retained for a 6th does that work?

 

[rt]

I’d take a 4th for Gagner 50% retained and Gagner 25% retained for a 6th does that work?

I’d do a 2019 4th for Gagner @50%. I’m a Yotes fan. I liked him and was sad to see him go. We don’t have a 4th this year. And we’re broke.

 

[dayner]

I’d do a 2019 4th for Gagner @50%. I’m a Yotes fan. I liked him and was sad to see him go. We don’t have a 4th this year. And we’re broke.

I do wonder the status of some of your prospects that are still in the AHL.

Nick Merkley lets say. Was a ppg in with Tuscon but does he really have a place in the NHL? Yotes have good centre depth, especially is Strome makes it next year and I dont think Merkley as a bottom 6 winger would work for him. So what about

Merkley
Cap Dump.....which you don't really have

for

Gagner (50%) retained


Edit: Maybe Kruger as a cap dump depending on your clubs stance on him

 

[Halla]

none of those guys are worth much.
Baertschi maybe a 2nd + B prospect at the deadline.
Hutton might bring a 2nd to a team that believes he has upside.
the others mid rd picks

leafs offer their 2018 1st,carrick and choice of prospect among Bracco/Nielsen/Timashov for Tanev

 

[Halla]

I do wonder the status of some of your prospects that are still in the AHL.

Nick Merkley lets say. Was a ppg in with Tuscon but does he really have a place in the NHL? Yotes have good centre depth, especially is Strome makes it next year and I dont think Merkley as a bottom 6 winger would work for him. So what about

Merkley
Cap Dump.....which you don't really have

for

Gagner (50%) retained


Edit: Maybe Kruger as a cap dump depending on your clubs stance on him

you arent getting one of the yotes top prospects for sam gagner.

would you do juolevi for a retained demers? doesnt make too much sense for a rebuilding club huh?

 

[Hockey Rush]

I do wonder the status of some of your prospects that are still in the AHL.

Nick Merkley lets say. Was a ppg in with Tuscon but does he really have a place in the NHL? Yotes have good centre depth, especially is Strome makes it next year and I dont think Merkley as a bottom 6 winger would work for him. So what about

Merkley
Cap Dump.....which you don't really have

for

Gagner (50%) retained


Edit: Maybe Kruger as a cap dump depending on your clubs stance on him

You would pay Nick Merkley for him with 50% retained? I would be in board if Jim believed Merkley had some upside.

 

[CherryToke]

19 and a 3rd in 2019 is our best offer.

Click

 

[Jester9881]

Islanders should have interest in Gaunce.

 

[Mr Plow]

How are Vancouver fans feeling about Gagner? Would you be willing to retain salary and move him for a very small return? For example, would a 2019 7th rounder for Gagner at 50% retention be tempting? Or would the pick have to be higher and/or the retention lower?

I think Gagner is worth more than that at 50% salary. I would rather just get the cap completely off the books after next year so we can be more flexible in 2019 free agency.

How was Kruger last year and how do you value him compared to Gagner?

 

[rt]

I think Gagner is worth more than that at 50% salary. I would rather just get the cap completely off the books after next year so we can be more flexible in 2019 free agency.

How was Kruger last year and how do you value him compared to Gagner?

We just traded for Kruger like two weeks ago. We’re not trading him now. Makes no sense. Anyway, we moved our 4th line LW for him and Carolina gave us their 3rd. The pick had the most value of the three pieces in the trade. So I guess that means Carolina felt Kruger had negative value. After all, he did clear waivers and they did retain salary in the deal.

 

[rt]

I do wonder the status of some of your prospects that are still in the AHL.

Nick Merkley lets say. Was a ppg in with Tuscon but does he really have a place in the NHL? Yotes have good centre depth, especially is Strome makes it next year and I dont think Merkley as a bottom 6 winger would work for him. So what about

Merkley
Cap Dump.....which you don't really have

for

Gagner (50%) retained


Edit: Maybe Kruger as a cap dump depending on your clubs stance on him

No chance.