chupanibre
The GhostBear Cometh
we all know that in 10 years Zac Rinaldo will be the new head coach, so why wait? make Rinny coach tomorrow! what could possibly go wrong
Babock
Tippet
McLellan
Is zero on the good side or the bad side for sarcasm?
Im younger than nearly the entire team, but I do have extensive experience playing NHL99 for N64 when I was a kid.
Promoting from within would be awful. I don't want Murray. After that it's what, Murphy, Lappy (the one guy with less experience than Berube, also absurd that he's an NHL assistant right now), or Cote (Who is basically Berube a few years ago and is too busy chugging hemp smoothies).
The rumors of Babcock wanting a large amount of control overlapping into GM duties have me concerned. I'm not sure I want that. On the other hand, I'm not sure I'm worried about his attachment to terrible players. Cleary is the clear example there, and that's at least understandable since Cleary was in Detroit playing for Babcock for a while, and he played very well in the past. Our garbage players are guys he has no attachment or bias towards, in theory.
I guess I'm 50/50 on Babcock. If it's between him and Berube the choice is easy though.
Randy Carlyle? Deboer is ehh.... McLean, Tippett if he is fired.
he's not fat
I dislike Berube as much as anyone, but just to play devil's advocate:
- He has a winning record
- He has gotten most out of Schultz, MDZ, VV, Voracek and PEB
- Hextall knows the roster given to him isn't great
I honestly won't be surprised if he is not fired.
I dislike Berube as much as anyone, but just to play devil's advocate:
- He has a winning record
- He has gotten most out of Schultz, MDZ, VV, Voracek and PEB
- Hextall knows the roster given to him isn't great
I honestly won't be surprised if he is not fired.
Neither one of these things are because of him, they're in spite of him.
Guy Boucher - probably spelled it wrong but no time to look up spelling.
The guy who coached in Tampa with the scare face.
That and as bad as this roster is, with even slightly better coaching, is a playoff team.
Is this right?
http://www.nj.com/flyers/index.ssf/2015/03/can_flyers_coach_craig_berube_survive_its_not_look.html
Hextall probably would like to keep Berube, who has two more seasons on his contract and offers a lot.
Is this right?
http://www.nj.com/flyers/index.ssf/2015/03/can_flyers_coach_craig_berube_survive_its_not_look.html
Hextall probably would like to keep Berube, who has two more seasons on his contract and offers a lot.
Maybe we can trade Voracek to the KHL for a coach.
Watch out, i suggested this before and no one likes this idea. I think he would have been great for the team right after Pronger's career ended. Its amazing what the guy did with a top pairing defense of essentially a 18-19 year old Hedman- and Kubina. But a lot of people believe his style is typical junior gimmicky, and only focus on the hardcore trap they played against us that one game...
I don't think the coach really matters. There are probably better options than Berube but I don't think it helps as much as everyone thinks. Even Babcock doesn't make Philly a playoff team let alone a cup contender with the roster as constructed. Best case scenario, you're looking at a 3 year window before they even become competitive. Then another 2-4 before they can possibly be considered a cup contender.
The Flyers are in a rebuild without strictly saying so. Not just with the NHL roster but the organization as a whole. A massive structural change of that nature takes years and is done bottom up. Hextall will make changes to the AHL/ECHL levels and player development while slower gradual changes take place with the NHL roster and team as a whole (coaches, staff, scouts, ect...), some of which we have seen already.
The likes of Detroit, LA, Chicago, Montreal, Boston/Vancouver to an extent, and the emerging Lightning, have spent years not just building a good NHL team but have near perfected an organization that supports the style and philosophy of the team itself. Building an effective roster is the result of the work behind the scenes at the end of the day, not what comes first.
Talent is not all there is when it comes to hockey. Edmonton is the perfect example of immense talent without and structural support. Yes, part of the coaches job is to synergize it's roster in the best way possible, but that's not an objective thing. Worse yet, you can't fit a square peg in a round hole without encountering difficulties. Philly doesn't have just one of those but 4 or 5. No coach is gonna fix a problem like that.