He's no better, check their stats.Bagent sucks. When does Fields get back?
Fields last 5 full games (not counting the injury game)He's no better, check their stats.
One can just tell when a qb has “it”, and he doesn’t.Fields last 5 full games (not counting the injury game)
60/106 57% 3 TD 4 INT 66.1 Rating
Bagent's 1st 5 games of his career
74/110 67.3% 3TD 6 INT 70.9 Rating
I wonder what Bagent's numbers would be AFTER 3 training camps and 30 games like Fields has played.
Think he may improve?
To address @Illinihockey's question from
OT: - Bears & NFL Talk 95
shheeeeeeeeeeeeeeeesh So it's exactly like I said when the trade was made? Shocking.forums.hfboards.com
1. I stated "interior OL", excluding the tackles Darnell Wright, Larry Borom (who's done a decent job when called upon, from what I read), and Braxton Jones.
2. Nate Davis got a two-year deal. So in two years, he's gone. Besides, so far in his brief Bears stint, he's about as oft-injured/unavailable as Teven Jenkins, if not more so.
And this just in (to me):
Bears keep riding QB roller coaster as Tyson Bagent spirals and they wait for Justin Fields
"Every offensive lineman except Teven Jenkins committed a false-start or holding penalty. In the third quarter, Lucas Patrick and Braxton Jones got flagged for holding on the same play before Jones followed with a false start."
Great collection of OL there.
Yeah, those aren't close to Fields correct statsFields last 5 full games (not counting the injury game)
60/106 57% 3 TD 4 INT 66.1 Rating
Bagent's 1st 5 games of his career
74/110 67.3% 3TD 6 INT 70.9 Rating
I wonder what Bagent's numbers would be AFTER 3 training camps and 30 games like Fields has played.
Think he may improve?
Fields last 5 full games (not counting the injury game)
60/106 57% 3 TD 4 INT 66.1 Rating
Bagent's 1st 5 games of his career
74/110 67.3% 3TD 6 INT 70.9 Rating
I wonder what Bagent's numbers would be AFTER 3 training camps and 30 games like Fields has played.
Think he may improve?
I don't think Fields is the long-term answer but I also don't think making up stats is a good strategy here. He literally threw 4 TDs in two of those five games. Hopefully most people who read this have a memory that can stretch all the way back to a month ago.Fields last 5 full games (not counting the injury game)
60/106 57% 3 TD 4 INT 66.1 Rating
Bagent's 1st 5 games of his career
74/110 67.3% 3TD 6 INT 70.9 Rating
I wonder what Bagent's numbers would be AFTER 3 training camps and 30 games like Fields has played.
Think he may improve?
Yeah, those aren't close to Fields correct stats
62%, 11 TD, 5 INT 92 rating
Not with that noodle arm.
Also, what the hell stats are you looking at? His last two games before injury he had 8 TD, 1 INT, and a 125+ QBR...
My bad (had a couple of screens open and goofed up-DOH)I don't think Fields is the long-term answer but I also don't think making up stats is a good strategy here. He literally threw 4 TDs in two of those five games. Hopefully most people who read this have a memory that can stretch all the way back to a month ago.
I actually think any result is fine here. If the Bears win, the Panthers will, as you say, stay in the hunt for #1. But the Bears will drop from #3 to around #6. However, if the Panthers win, the Bears would move to #2 and the Panthers would drop to #3 based on tiebreakers, so we would stay in the #2 and #3 spot. A tie might end up being one of the worst cases because it ruins the Bears amazing strength of schedule tiebreakers while also making it harder for the Panthers to get the #1 pick. In my opinion, I'd rather have the Panthers win so we have a strong shot at #2 and #3, which imo is better than the #1 pick and a mid-top 10 pick given that Maye and Williams both seem pretty close.Important for bears to win to keep the number 1 pick alive.