Didn't watch the game, but just caught the highlights after work and I'd like to voice my pure opinion on the matter. I fully understand the idea of having a grinder-esque player to support skill players, but if that player doesn't have skill, then it won't do anything in the long run and just make it harder for the skill players to play. For instance, it worked in the case of Kane-Panarin and now Stamkos-Kucherov because Name and Anisimov are good at getting the puck but also are good at handling it. Hyman works just as hard, but has the hockey IQ of a donkey when the puck is on his stick. You see this on the break out when Matthews and Nylander have tried to pass to him and he gets stuck in the neutral zone because he can't balance the puck on his stick properly. It speaks volumes that Matthews is nearly top of the league in scoring when he's STILL not scoring well enough on HD chances for league average. This applies to other lines as well. The team is fast. VERY FAST. When the team gets in the zone, they are one of the best teams in the league in possession. The problem is the initiative. It seems like from game to game, the team doesn't know if it want to burn with speed or play possession. The forwards minus the first line still aren't that good at supporting defence, which makes the D look worse than it is (which doesn't excuse the crapshoot the STL game was). There's problems with this team, and it's mostly chemistry based, but Babcock needs to do this soon, or we could end up just outside of the 8th seed by the end of the season.