That's literally how streaks and numbers work. Like... you're just arguing against logic even though you think you aren't.5 of 27. What a ******ed sample size. Try to even pick some round numbers to not appear cherry picking some stats that support your agenda.
Surely one single person on HF must agree with you. Or not.Try last 10, last 20, last 30, or ”this year”. Anything else is moronic.
It's only partially this. There is a good post over on the Avs board that looks at the underlying numbers. They're usually outshooting, outplaying and out-chancing opponents. The issue is goaltending. The Avs goalies don't make the saves other teams goalies are making throughout the game.Well just having one line finally caught up with them.
5 of 27. What a ******ed sample size. Try to even pick some round numbers to not appear cherry picking some stats that support your agenda.
[...]
I’m a Habs fan who lives in Toronto. What on earth could possibly be the case where I’d have an agenda against the Colorado Avalanche?
The top line can do something when they have the puck in OT which rarely happens But when the other team starts cycling the puck there is always one that will lose his cover then they are in panic mode suddenly they hit each other or everyone is losing his men then you hear Moser : Score.Damn, 1-11.
You'd think that top line would excel with all the open ice but I guess not. Does their coach not start with that line in OT?
And absolutely, a couple of those losses being wins would certainly have turned their season around. Definitely would've made that loser point column a little more palatable too, instead of being so far ahead of almost every other team.
The top line can do something when they have the puck in OT which rarely happens But when the other team starts cycling the puck there is always one that will lose his cover then they are in panic mode suddenly they hit each other or everyone is losing his men then you hear Moser : Score.
Yes, I’ve noted that journalists and hockey fans alike constantly use hyperbole and cherry picked garbage stats to support their agenda, whether it is to make someone look bad or to pump their tires.
Well just having one line finally caught up with them.
At least Dallas are winning some while the Avs won their only OT win in the PP but even then they found a way to lose one in PP when ROR scored a SHG. It's actually funny to see the Avs play in OT they look like a bunch of Pee Wee's that are lost when they don't have the puckDallas is similarly top-heavy up front, same as the Avs, and they've also lost a couple of OT games on the first possession, like within the first minute.
Probably the one time where faceoff winning % is insanely important. Almost on par with winning an overtime coin toss in the NFL playoffs, only there's actually some level of skill involved and it's not based on luck.
More like having just one goalie caught up with them.
We have one goalie?
I did, actually. It wasn’t enough for him to show the avs have won only 27% of their last 30, he had to push it further, only 19% of their last 27!! Wow! They really suck guys! Let’s discuss!
Just looked it up and the Oilers have won 9 in their last 27.
THE OILERS
DAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAMN