deadhead
Registered User
- Feb 26, 2014
- 49,215
- 21,617
This game isn’t as simple as score more!!
Well in a sense it is, the tricky part is how do you score more than the other team.
This game isn’t as simple as score more!!
That's what I've been wondering since hits were compared to goals.
I mean, you should be laughing at yourself. Your question was vague, completely unrelated, and pointless. You started by comparing hits and goals, which is an awful start. I was trying to figure out what the hell your point even was so I could answer your question.
My questions, which get avoided, are far more straightforward and self-evident. Things like, "Do you think playing our best RW at a 3rd line rate is good coaching?"
No he doesn't, unless you are going by game.
My first reply to your asinine suggestion that "Ghoul hits at the same rate as Provorov" was this:
Which, after about 3 or 4 posts of your dodging the subject, you grudgingly admitted.
I'm not in this to play a game of "gotcha!" But you've certainly been. So I do think it's funny how much you tried to run from your your own asinine statement that "Ghoul hits at the same rate as Provorov" before you finally admitted that "Ghoul hits more."
If I make $40 mowing my grandmoms lawn and you make $40 an hour at the donut shop, who has the worse opinion of the current head coach?
I made it clear it was a game rate. If you'd read the discussion you may have picked up on that context. There was nothing grudging about it. Once you ceased babbling and made yourself clear I answered.
This is nothing but an absurd gotcha, that's the only reason you're still going. Every other issue was clarified long ago, but clearly you're going after something else. Like, say, a sad trap based around my not knowing how to answer an absolutely nonsensical question. You may as well have asked "I have 7 walnuts, using four bricks how many cars is that?"
Btw, I hate no one on this board. I would never block anyone. There are posters who try my patience, but I never, ever think my opinion is infallible. Beef, we don't see eye-to-eye often. But you like Warren Zevon. So we've got something. I don't think Dave Hakstol is the end of the world. I'd fire him, because he's boring, but I'm a bit hesitant, because I ultimately was on board with firing Laviolette, and I think that was a big mistake.
We also both dislike being disemboweled. That's at least two things!
@deadhead enjoys Dire Straits so he is a best friend. I don't know his stance on disembowelment though.
"I have 7 walnuts, using four bricks how many cars is that?"
I know this one!
The car appears to be roughly 6 bricks by 25 bricks, giving us a total brick usage of approximately 150. Four bricks would thus be ~2.67 percent of a car.
You'll probably be hungry enough to eat the walnuts after laying that many bricks, so I wouldn't count on still having all 7.
Mark Knopfler is technically flawed, werewolves of london sucks and Hakstol 4 lyfe. Too much buddy buddy going on in this thread for my liking. Time to muck it up.
We also both dislike being disemboweled. That's at least two things!
@deadhead enjoys Dire Straits so he is a best friend. I don't know his stance on disembowelment though.
I'm going to send you to work on the whale ships.
I am not arguing with you Ted. I agree it can be useful. Like I have state in each post. I don’t like the way it’s used by people. This is a good example of how to use it right. My post was to show difference in wording and how that can create two different statements.The example shows he was one of the best forwards with 1000~TOI in Goals Per 60, Points Per 60, Primary Points Per 60, and Game Score Per 60. My statement heavily implies that he’s one of the best FWDS among his closest comparables, & just among his closest comparables. I thought that was clear as day by my wording.