peter sullivan
Winnipeg
- Apr 9, 2010
- 2,356
- 4
im in....how much?
Which is why most people are wrong.
Saying...
'We don't want you in our group'
is not at all comparable to saying...
'You are in our group, you purchased this business....but we are not going to let you change the location in which you operate'.
Enormous difference....
I disagree with Chicken Parm to a degree. While NASCAR might be a strong #2 in the suburbs of Atlanta, within and around I-285 (almost 3m people) The Falcons and Braves are substantially more important than NASCAR.
Atlanta's not a great sports town, sure. Is Seattle? Is San Diego? Is LA? Is Miami? Really, only the older cities are great sports towns and for good reason. The Thrashers with these owners would have had the same problems if they were in Raleigh, Nashville, Miami, Tampa, Columbus...or even Calgary or Buffalo.
Without knwing his true intent, I believe that Ferraro was making a comment on Nascar being #2 simply to illustrate that Hockey is a ways behind in the hearts and minds (passion) of the people/market of Georgia, and not necessarily refering to the number of events or overall attendence.
Yes I am. Big League is the best. How many Canadians watch the AHL?You've said this a few times, but I'm still not sure what you mean by "good image"? Why are so you concerned about how the NHL may or may not be perceived in the United States?
Are you one of these people who can't appreciate anything unless it's considered "big-league" or popular?
Further, the NHL's "good image" in Canada is essentially the economic engine that drives the League, so it sure as **** does matter, doesn't it?
What is the timeline looking like to find a new local owner? I read reports a month or two back saying the ASG had anywhere between 4 weeks to 4 months to find a new owner.
It's incredibly difficult for the leagues to block the current owner from moving his franchise, unless they have a limited period where they can't move after a sale. Easy for the league to block a relocation by a new owner by blocking the sale.
NHL By-Law 36 would argue against the first sentence, and any team relocating without the consent of a majority of the Board of Governors would be subject to penalties as specified in the NHL Constitution - up to the involuntary termination of the franchise.It's incredibly difficult for the leagues to block the current owner from moving his franchise, unless they have a limited period where they can't move after a sale. Easy for the league to block a relocation by a new owner by blocking the sale.
NHL By-Law 36 would argue against the first sentence, and any team relocating without the consent of a majority of the Board of Governors would be subject to penalties as specified in the NHL Constitution - up to the involuntary termination of the franchise.
The Thrashers have lost $130 million the last five years, according to court documents.
I'm thinking somewhat like the Verizon Center / Wizards / Capitals here in DC.
Good luck enforcing that when it goes to court.NHL By-Law 36 would argue against the first sentence, and any team relocating without the consent of a majority of the Board of Governors would be subject to penalties as specified in the NHL Constitution - up to the involuntary termination of the franchise.
Yeah, we've heard that about 1,234,423,849,452,543,878,345.12326287965 times already. We've also explained the Atlanta Septoturd Group shell game between the Thrashers, Hawks and Philips Arena the same amount of times.
Basically, you can show a loss however you like.
I'll let kdb shoot down your hypothesis. Goodness knows he's only done it about 1200 times in other threads when people start in with "______ can move his team wherever he wants."Good luck enforcing that when it goes to court.
The owners have publicly claimed that they lose X amount per season on the Thrashers operation. I understand the attempt by Atlanta fans to mitigate the perceived damage to their market by claiming that losses elsewhere have been attributed to the Thrashers; however, if the NHL agreed with you they'd most certainly have disputed such claims by the owners. They haven't.
Regardless of what any of us choose to believe, I'm sure this will all come out in the court battle between King & Spalding and AS, LLC. In an effort to prove their damages claim, they'll need to submit those books as evidence.
It'll all come out in the end. Every single dirty lie.
You are most certainly free to believe whatever you wish; I'm simply stating that in my opinion the NHL's actions to date do not exactly back the claims made by the poster that I was replying to.