seventieslord
Student Of The Game
Who cares about the numbers when you have witnessed them , you should both be old enough to have seen them play , it's pretty clear Tkachuk was the best player but almost impossible to win with while Tocchet was a better team player and probably more useful if you want to win.Tkachuk dominated the ice more than Tocchet I thought it was pretty clear at the time.
I can accept Tocchet was a better team player. More useful? Let's get serious here. Put Tkachuk in Tocchet's place. Are his teams worse? of course not. I bet they are even more dominant. Put Tocchet in Tkachuk's place. Does St. Louis go anywhere? No. In fact they are probably even more disappointing.
I'm not saying Walker is a zero offensively.. but to call him a two-way player is incredibly misleading. A two-way player, to me, is capable of playing solid defense while also contributing offense on a regular basis. Sure, Walker can chip in here and there, but I don't see him hitting 50-60 points over the course of a simulated ATD season like I'd expect an actual two-way player to.
BM67 is the master of the "vs. #2" system so he should post some numbers to demonstrate Walker's offensive potential.
Although I am a believer that, if this is to be apples-to-apples, vs #1 should be the metric for Walker's pre-merger seasons.
After that is done, we can compare to guys like Gainey, Ramsay, Metz, Provost, etc, and get an idea of where he falls in the pecking order among the best 3rd line defensive wingers offensively.
Of course, the above 4 didn't spend their primes playing with Frank Foyston and Bernie Morris, and Walker did. (Provost was with Henri for a while though). And, whatever benefit the PP provided in the PCHA, Walker won't be the beneficiary of it, as he won't be getting PP time. Gainey, Ramsay, and Provost scored from 6-12% of their career points on the PP so I don't think this factor affects them much, but Walker was on the first (only) line so this would affect him.