I know there is still time to do minor adjustment.
But we could compare our team as of October 2013 with the team we have right now.
But we could compare our team as of October 2013 with the team we have right now.
Last edited:
I'd say we're better than Oct 2013 but noticeably worse than post deadline/playoffs 2014.
I'd say we're better than Oct 2013 but noticeably worse than post deadline/playoffs 2014.
I posted the poll to exclude Vanek.Exactly my thought. Losing Vanek hurts.
I agree with everything but I would add a caveat:it's not su much the talent that makes this team better than the one we had at the start of last season, it's the structure put in place that makes us (slightly) better now, but MUCH better in the future...
- no more 4th line C at 4Mil, 850K just like top teams have
- 4th, 5th and 6th D makes less (Gilbert at 2.8 instead of Gorges at 3.9), wich is also the case on top teams
- we got bigger (not more physical though), wich is what we see in top teams
- we now have 3 C who are at worst decent defensively, like top teams have
- we didnt sign the new guys long term, preventing us from a fiasco ala Ehrhoff or Richards
- by trading Gorges and letting Gionta go, the younger guys that we developped are offcially the core, meaning that winning or losing goes trough them, wich in turn means we wont need to spend ridiculous amounts on UFA or make crazy trades
- we made room for a young D by not re-signing Cube/Murray
- we also have room for a youngster upfront while we could still manage if no youngsters make it.
all in all, I wouldnt say we built a contender for next season, but the way MB played with the structure, everything is in place for the Habs to be very good for a while...
I agree with everything but I would add a caveat:
We built a contender in the East for next season...
I agree with everything but I would add a caveat:
We built a contender in the East for next season...
Better than October 2013 but worse than what we had during the playoffs...
I'd try to get Yakupov out of Edmonton...if we could trade Eller + (maybe Pateryn, 2nd and a mid-prospect) for Yakupov then great...otherwise I'd trade Plekanec for Yakupov (add some picks here and there) and then try and sign Ott for 3-4 years...
Patches - Desharnais - Parenteau
Yakupov - Galchenyuk - Gallagher
Bourque - Eller - Ott/Sekac
Prust - Malhotra - Weisz/Moen/Bournival
Markov - Subban
Emelin - Gilbert
Beaulieu - Weaver/Tinordi
Price
Budaj/Tokarsky
I'd say we're better than Oct 2013 but noticeably worse than post deadline/playoffs 2014.
it's not su much the talent that makes this team better than the one we had at the start of last season, it's the structure put in place that makes us (slightly) better now, but MUCH better in the future...
- no more 4th line C at 4Mil, 850K just like top teams have
- 4th, 5th and 6th D makes less (Gilbert at 2.8 instead of Gorges at 3.9), wich is also the case on top teams
- we got bigger (not more physical though), wich is what we see in top teams
- we now have 3 C who are at worst decent defensively, like top teams have
- we didnt sign the new guys long term, preventing us from a fiasco ala Ehrhoff or Richards
- by trading Gorges and letting Gionta go, the younger guys that we developped are offcially the core, meaning that winning or losing goes trough them, wich in turn means we wont need to spend ridiculous amounts on UFA or make crazy trades
- we made room for a young D by not re-signing Cube/Murray
- we also have room for a youngster upfront while we could still manage if no youngsters make it.
all in all, I wouldnt say we built a contender for next season, but the way MB played with the structure, everything is in place for the Habs to be very good for a while...