Value of: Artemi Panarin

[Stickpucker]

1. Skinner is a UFA in 1 year too, genius. Why wouldn't they just keep Panarin if Skinner is the main piece coming back?
2. Gauthier's and Bean's draft positions are irrelevant. Gauthier was getting healthy scratched in the AHL. Bean could still turn out to be something but from what I have read, he hasn't been setting the world on fire in Juniors.
3. I am not a CBJ fan. I just know that they aren't going to trade Panarin for an inferior rental, a bust prospect and an up in the air prospect. The Jackets are in win-now mode. They can get better players with more term than what you offered. ex. Zucker and Nino from the Wild as was proposed in this thread.

1. Maybe CBJ feel more confident they can resign Skinner long term than Panarin, genius.
2. Gauthier isn't a bust but Carolina's cupboard is really full especially on the wing. Everyone also knows PWF take longer to develop. Bean has been developing well.
3. Maybe CBJ feels trading for Zucker would be buying high at this point. I admittedly don't watch him a lot...this could've also been a legit breakout year for him. I'll leave that for Min/CBJ fans to discern. Nino's career average is closer to 40 points is his value that high around the league?

 

[oilers84]

To cbl
Aberg
Lucic
1st 2019
Wells

To edm
Panarin
Vehviläinen

 

[DeagleJenkins]

With the understanding that they'd only offer that if Panarin wasn't a rental and was certain to extend with the Wild, which isn't likely. As a 1-year rental (which is almost certainly what he'd be for Minnesota) they couldn't offer nearly that much.

If he is signed would you offer up Spurgeon and Zucker/Nino for maybe Panarin + 2nd rd pick?

 

[Zajacs Bowl Cut]

Jesper Bratt
Michael McLeod
2019 1st
2020 2nd

 

[Bazeek]

If he is signed would you offer up Spurgeon and Zucker/Nino for maybe Panarin + 2nd rd pick?

I'd be okay with that personally. Paying Spurgeon to upgrade on Zucker/Nino is a hell of a price, but I think it's a hit the Wild could absorb and Panarin is exactly the sort of player they could probably use right now.

Again though, I'm very skeptical that he'd want to commit to Minnesota long-term.

 

[CBJx614]

To cbl
Aberg
Lucic
1st 2019
Wells

To edm
Panarin
Vehviläinen

 

[Hello Johnny]

To cbl
Aberg
Lucic
1st 2019
Wells

To edm
Panarin
Vehviläinen

Is this serious?

 

[DeagleJenkins]

I'd be okay with that personally. Paying Spurgeon to upgrade on Zucker/Nino is a hell of a price, but I think it's a hit the Wild could absorb and Panarin is exactly the sort of player they could probably use right now.

Again though, I'm very skeptical that he'd want to commit to Minnesota long-term.

yes i understand thats why i said if he is signed not just a 1 year rental. I understand how good spurgeon is for us but to upgrade at forward and get panarin he is one piece i can understand moving since we signed a quality depth RHD.

 

[Fro]

To cbl
Aberg
Lu

Stopped there...no

 

[JohnnyJacket13]

To cbl
Aberg
Lucic
1st 2019
Wells

To edm
Panarin
Vehviläinen

Wow that is god awful.

 

[Viqsi]

To cbl
Aberg
Lucic
1st 2019
Wells

To edm
Panarin
Vehviläinen

I wouldn't accept that package for Brandon ****ing Dubinsky, let alone Panarin.

 

[Crede777]

I wouldn't accept that package for Brandon ****ing Dubinsky, let alone Panarin.

It would be pretty great to trade Panarin to Edmonton.

Big city and the beach you say?

Edit - Nothing against Edmonton by the way. It's just no NYC/Chicago/LA or maybe it is...

 

[ziggy7716]

2019 1st
2020 2nd
Kieffer Bellows
Josh Ho-Sang
Brock Nelson

For Artemi Panarin

 

[JohnnyJacket13]

2019 1st
2020 2nd
Kieffer Bellows
Josh Ho-Sang
Brock Nelson

For Artemi Panarin

Wahlstrom is a requirement to be in any deal with the Islanders.

Don't want to trade him? Ok, you're not acquiring Panarin. Not with that garbage you just offered. Go away.

 

[Dr Quincy]

I know the rules. I just don't agree with them. It should be changed in the next CBA. Panarin is holding the Blue Jackets hostage and he has only played 3 full seasons. He is scheduled to be UFA after 4 seasons. He should be forced to go through 7 years of RFA like most young players.

What's wrong with the party in a negotation that has leverage using it?

Is it any different than when a GM says to a 23 year old player whose contract is up: "Hey you can play here for what we are offering or you can go get a job doing something other than hockey." I think it was the OTT GM who told Mikael Wikstrand he could play in OTT or bag groceries. Is that not holding the player hostage?

If we implement your rules a Euro comes over at 28 and won't be a UFA until he's 35, at which point he'd be subject to a 35+ contract and would get few good offers. That doesn't seem very fair either.

 

[inthe6ix]

Saad

 

[Dr Quincy]

Wahlstrom is a requirement to be in any deal with the Islanders.

Don't want to trade him? Ok, you're not acquiring Panarin. Not with that garbage you just offered. Go away.

I love when posters do their Brian Doyle Murray "Caddy Shack" impersonation. +1

 

[mikeyp24]

To be fair Wahlstrom would be required because he would coming back for a signed Panarin within the division... It would be very expensive.