Around the NHL

Status
Not open for further replies.

WolfHouse

Registered User
Oct 4, 2020
9,354
14,270
Start with failing to sell out a small arena - even with low ticket prices. Add low $C.
That arena was sold out (for seats without a pillar in your view) in the first years the Jets were back... god awful hockey pushed people away

It wasn't attendance - it was Winnipeg Enterprises preventing Shenkarow from getting his Exec Suites - it was a long line of Winnipeg egos and agendas...
 

None

Registered User
Feb 22, 2012
11,617
17,131
SO many free games on NHL.tv this year and I'm yet to find a single one that invloves Winnipeg. :banghead:

Tuesday's game being Pierre-Luc Dubois' first game might be one of the free games. They made the Laine Blue Jackets debut game free pretty late I think.
 

flyingkiwi

Registered User
Oct 28, 2014
4,369
3,577
France
Tuesday's game being Pierre-Luc Dubois' first game might be one of the free games. They made the Laine Blue Jackets debut game free pretty late I think.
Fingers crossed. But it looks like the Ducks Vegas game is pencilled in as the free one that day so I'm not too confident.

If I wasn't planning on starting postgrad in September I'd be a little less cheap and just buy the subscription. The blackout situation in France seems to be a non-issue. Other forms of streaming are no use either cause there's no way in hell I'm getting up to watch it live on some buggy ass site.
 

Mortimer Snerd

You kids get off my lawn!
Sponsor
Jun 10, 2014
57,471
29,331
That arena was sold out (for seats without a pillar in your view) in the first years the Jets were back... god awful hockey pushed people away

It wasn't attendance - it was Winnipeg Enterprises preventing Shenkarow from getting his Exec Suites - it was a long line of Winnipeg egos and agendas...

Jets 1.0 avg a little over 13k tickets sold their entire time in the NHL. I don't have the exact figure handy anymore, but I added up every ticket sold years ago.
NVM, found it.


Attendance
Yearper gamecapacityrate
79/80132841556585.35%
80/81132641556585.22%
81/82133821556585.97%
82/83129351556583.10%
83/84123981556579.65%
84/85129781556583.38%
85/86136941556587.98%
86/87135921556587.32%
87/88126811556581.47%
88/89127751556582.08%
89/90131061556584.20%
90/91129321556583.08%
91/92129901556583.46%
92/93135501556587.05%
93/94132971556585.43%
95130131556583.60%
95/96113161556572.70%
Avg130111556583.59%
[TBODY] [/TBODY]
[TBODY] [/TBODY]

Ticket sales was their single biggest problem. Those numbers include all those 7/11 tickets that were practically given away.

Their fate was sealed before they played their first NHL game when the City of Winnipeg backed out of the City/Provincial/Federal plan to build a new arena. That old barn just didn't have enough good seats that people were willing to pay top dollar for, or even to buy at low prices.
 

WolfHouse

Registered User
Oct 4, 2020
9,354
14,270
Jets 1.0 avg a little over 13k tickets sold their entire time in the NHL. I don't have the exact figure handy anymore, but I added up every ticket sold years ago.
NVM, found it.

Attendance
Yearper gamecapacityrate
79/80132841556585.35%
80/81132641556585.22%
81/82133821556585.97%
82/83129351556583.10%
83/84123981556579.65%
84/85129781556583.38%
85/86136941556587.98%
86/87135921556587.32%
87/88126811556581.47%
88/89127751556582.08%
89/90131061556584.20%
90/91129321556583.08%
91/92129901556583.46%
92/93135501556587.05%
93/94132971556585.43%
95130131556583.60%
95/96113161556572.70%
Avg130111556583.59%
[TBODY] [/TBODY]
[TBODY] [/TBODY]
Ticket sales was their single biggest problem. Those numbers include all those 7/11 tickets that were practically given away.

Their fate was sealed before they played their first NHL game when the City of Winnipeg backed out of the City/Provincial/Federal plan to build a new arena. That old barn just didn't have enough good seats that people were willing to pay top dollar for, or even to buy at low prices.
There were several teams with far worse attendance than the Jets... can't really blame people for not going to games to not be able to see the game haha

I agree that Winnipeg did everything it could to fk up the Jets 1.0 but it was the standoff over luxury boxes at the end that killed it - and that's on Winnipeg Enterprises
 

Mortimer Snerd

You kids get off my lawn!
Sponsor
Jun 10, 2014
57,471
29,331
There were several teams with far worse attendance than the Jets... can't really blame people for not going to games to not be able to see the game haha

I agree that Winnipeg did everything it could to fk up the Jets 1.0 but it was the standoff over luxury boxes at the end that killed it - and that's on Winnipeg Enterprises

The luxury boxes were another part of the new arena deal that CoW fu**ed up. So were the bad sight lines. But so too were the low prices for the seats that did sell and the low $C. The other teams with low attendance were US cities that at least did business in $US. You can bet they also had better local TV deals than Wpg too and then there are the sweetheart stadium deals like Florida has now. There are a lot of factors for most teams. No other team had as many difficulties to face as the Jets did except Quebec City, and look what happened to them. Went south a year before Jets did.

Winnipeg Enterprises wasn't the villain. They were just a landlord and probably more generous than some other landlords. Jets 1.0 were spared from having to come up with the capital to build their own arena. Money costs money. That said, they would have been better off walking away from Winnipeg arena when that deal fell through, even if they did need to borrow all of the money to build. I'm pretty sure they would have done that if they could have found a bank willing to lend them the money. IIRC the planned arena was about 75 mil, with 25/25/25 funding. Sounds cheap now. Just 7 years after Jets left TNSE was able to come up with 135 mil to build MTS Place. But that was 24 years after the plan to build a 75 mil arena. The 75 mil arena was probably bigger and nicer. Probably not as well located though.
 

WolfHouse

Registered User
Oct 4, 2020
9,354
14,270
The luxury boxes were another part of the new arena deal that CoW fu**ed up. So were the bad sight lines. But so too were the low prices for the seats that did sell and the low $C. The other teams with low attendance were US cities that at least did business in $US. You can bet they also had better local TV deals than Wpg too and then there are the sweetheart stadium deals like Florida has now. There are a lot of factors for most teams. No other team had as many difficulties to face as the Jets did except Quebec City, and look what happened to them. Went south a year before Jets did.

Winnipeg Enterprises wasn't the villain. They were just a landlord and probably more generous than some other landlords. Jets 1.0 were spared from having to come up with the capital to build their own arena. Money costs money. That said, they would have been better off walking away from Winnipeg arena when that deal fell through, even if they did need to borrow all of the money to build. I'm pretty sure they would have done that if they could have found a bank willing to lend them the money. IIRC the planned arena was about 75 mil, with 25/25/25 funding. Sounds cheap now. Just 7 years after Jets left TNSE was able to come up with 135 mil to build MTS Place. But that was 24 years after the plan to build a 75 mil arena. The 75 mil arena was probably bigger and nicer. Probably not as well located though.
When they said thanks but no thanks to Izzy Asper.... ah well... ha
 

ps241

The Ballad of Ville Bobby
Sponsor
Mar 10, 2010
34,909
31,396
Roslovic is Laine's centre today and is on PP1, Laine will the laser on CBJ's second pp

I will miss that one time clap bomb but thankfully I get to watch it on highlights still!
 

HannuJ

Registered User
Nov 20, 2011
8,108
3,669
Toronno
There were several teams with far worse attendance than the Jets... can't really blame people for not going to games to not be able to see the game haha

I agree that Winnipeg did everything it could to fk up the Jets 1.0 but it was the standoff over luxury boxes at the end that killed it - and that's on Winnipeg Enterprises
i mean, don't forget how shitty Wpg's economy was in the 90s. and 80s. and early 2000s.
wait, is Wpg's economy any good yet?
 

WaveRaven

Registered User
Apr 30, 2011
2,739
2,255
MB
The real killer of 1.0 was the NHL caving on the demand of a salary cap in the previous bargaining agreement.
Without cost certainty we and Quebec were doomed. Especially with all the issues like the barn.
 

jetsv2

Registered User
Jan 13, 2013
2,540
4,648
What the f*** just happened in the Columbus game. Goal review determined the play was onside when it was clearly offside. Columbus gets a penalty. Then during the intermission the refs realize it was offside so they remove the penalty even though half of it was already gone but the goal counts still?
 
  • Like
Reactions: JetsFan815

JetsFan815

Registered User
Jan 16, 2012
19,252
24,463
Oh man the CBJ just got screwed so bad. Carolina scores a goal, Torts challenges it for offside, the call stands, penalty called against CBJ. Carolina goes on the PP for like 40 seconds before the period ends. When we return to the 3rd period, apparently there's new angles of the offside call and it's determined that the play indeed was offside. The penalty against the CBJ is taken back but the goal still stands and the clock does not reset. Never seen anything like this. If they were gonna call back the penalty the clock should have reset to the goal time and the goal be taken back as well.
 
  • Like
Reactions: FonRiesen

cbcwpg

Registered User
May 18, 2010
20,262
20,921
Between the Pipes
01:15 left in the 2nd... Carolina scores.

Columbus challenges offside. The goal stands because is was deemed onside. Columbus are given a penalty for delay of game ( getting the challenge wrong ). 2nd period ends with no PP goal, but still 0:45 left for Carolina on the PP going into the 3rd.

The 3rd period is starting and now Carolina is no longer on the PP. Seems the NHL had a "better look" at the offside challenge and now it was offside. So no goal and the challenge PP is wiped out and the teams start the 3rd 5 on 5.

Refs apologize.

What the hell would they have done if Columbus has scored on the PP at the end of the 2nd? How can you find a better replay and not have it on the original review?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mortimer Snerd

Evil Little

Registered User
Jan 22, 2014
6,311
2,739
What the f*** just happened in the Columbus game. Goal review determined the play was onside when it was clearly offside. Columbus gets a penalty. Then during the intermission the refs realize it was offside so they remove the penalty even though half of it was already gone but the goal counts still?

Yeah, that's pathetic on the part of the on-ice officials (and off-ice, I guess). Just leave the penalty on and eat the f*** up.

The offside challenge is the worst thing to happen to the NHL rules in the last ten years, anyway. I'll never forgive the dumbass who let Duchene score that goal for it. Or Duchene either, for that matter.

Laine looked completely clueless on that goal. Just skating in a circle in the D zone with no attempt to cover anyone.
 

jetsv2

Registered User
Jan 13, 2013
2,540
4,648
Yeah, that's pathetic on the part of the on-ice officials (and off-ice, I guess). Just leave the penalty on and eat the f*** up.

The offside challenge is the worst thing to happen to the NHL rules in the last ten years, anyway. I'll never forgive the dumbass who let Duchene score that goal for it. Or Duchene either, for that matter.

Laine looked completely clueless on that goal. Just skating in a circle in the D zone with no attempt to cover anyone.
The league has a real problem here. By cancelling the penalty after play had resumed and the period had ended they have admitted the goal shouldn't have counted. If Columbus loses by 1 goal they have legitimate grounds to protest the results
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad