I’m also apprehensive about the virus and also injuries.
This is what worries me, too. I mean, say a player has hypertension. Yes, these are elite athletes, but high blood pressure is so common that you'd have to figure many of them have it. And, unfortunately, hypertension has been shown to be a pretty good predictor of who will NOT do well with the novel coronavirus.
Not to mention the families, and the staff. Hopefully, anyone over 65 will be actively discouraged from working the tourney in any capacity, and I checked a smattering of head coach ages, and they all fall under. Some are just over 60, which isn't ideal, but I guess we can fudge that.
The other thing I worry about is the pressure to conform. Hockey is extremely homogeneous - all for one, one for all. Everything is done for the team. And even if it's explicitly stated "stay home if you have family members who may be in danger and you feel like you should be with them", some are going feel pressure to come. Imagine a European player who lives in Europe with a kid with cystic fibrosis. He's got to come two weeks early to quarantine, I presume. He has to play, possibly for two months. THEN he has to isolate another two weeks once he flies home - or even if his family joins him in the states. And even so, it's an iffy situation - you're always going to be nervous about transmitting the virus asymptomatically. Add to that the extra stress that places on the family to take care of the theoretical child with CF, and you're really asking a lot of a player, particularly if it's a fourth-liner making the league minimum, or even a Black Ace.
Granted, that's a theoretical situation. But you can't tell me with the 1,200 or so people who will be directly involved in the game (players, Black Aces, coaches, trainers, doctors, etc.) that SOMETHING won't come up where someone's less than comfortable playing. And it's reasonable to be uncomfortable. The reason they're going to be tested frequently is that they're putting themselves - and possibly their families - at higher risk.
Not to mention that this will take away some testing capacity. Massachusetts has been reliably near or under 10% positive for awhile, which I take to be a good sign, and I trust our stats. But other states may need those tests - I don't think we're there nationally, yet. Maybe we will be in 6 weeks, when this is all planned to start.