Stickpucker
Playmaka
- Jan 18, 2014
- 15,388
- 37,168
I can see Bob testing Ufa bc I think he'll want to get paid and CBJ will need money for all their youngins.
I can see Bob testing Ufa bc I think he'll want to get paid and CBJ will need money for all their youngins.
They're both ways of getting you to, or just past, the floor. Like I said, of course they've done it to a larger degree, but between Bickell, and that, I don't think we are much better considering we're usually just above the floor in recent years. And I don't see how these situations would be any less likely to affect negotiations. Though I don't really expect either has affected them much.Buyouts and retention are one thing, Arizona is doing something nobody else does. Pronger, Datsyuk and Hossa type situations aren’t landing here.
Wouldn’t know if they did. Anyway, I never said that this happened. I said I’d raise an eyebrow if the organization told me they couldn’t find change in the couch cushions,while serially picking up contracts of players who would never step on the ice.
That is a good news, bad news scenario.
Good because he’d be available. Bad because he’d be asking for $9+ million (Price comparable). And he will probably get close to it.
Anyone with a sub who can post some snippets?
A deep look at Noah Hanifin and what he brings to the Flames...
most of the analysis is stuff that was explored frequently on this board. yes he has skills. yes he's excellent at zone entries/exits. yes he was heavily sheltered. yes his list of comparables includes stars and superstars, but also JustAGuys like Bogosian and Jonas Brodin. here is a chart used in the article. funnily enough it paints Hanifin in a poor light relative to the other successful young defensemen, but Justin Faulk comes out pretty well! https://cdn.theathletic.com/app/upl...n-Shot-2018-07-11-at-11.48.07-AM-1024x753.pngConclusion
Hanifin is a bit of a curious case. His list of comparables in the league is short and features some stars and superstars. It also has more than a few “merely competent” middle rotation defenders, many of whom Hanifin is closer to in terms of his first three years worth of results than to the stars.
That is mostly due to Hanifin’s first couple of seasons in the league which were just okay. His third season, however, showed a big spurt of progress, albeit in a very sheltered role. He’s a guy who has shown a penchant for transitioning the puck effectively but struggled to contribute to shots in the offensive zone and prevent zone entries at this own blueline.
What matters to the Flames is if Hanifin can continue to show further development in top-four circumstances.
If what you make your SM slaves do is reading and reporting Calgary hockey articles, you're 50 shades of shady.Anyone with a sub who can post some snippets?
A deep look at Noah Hanifin and what he brings to the Flames...
Yeah, I'm glad we avoided a 5-6 year, 25-30 mill deal with Lindolm. Guy's great, but not worth that.
Eh, he seems like a certainty to be useful 6 years from now, and by that time $5M deals are going to be standard for middle-6ers.
A little high. Not franchise-crippling, but it does feel good knowing that’s the number we traded away.
Eh, he seems like a certainty to be useful 6 years from now, and by that time $5M deals are going to be standard for middle-6ers.
I agree with this too. But if it’s standard 6 years from now, it’s high now.
Unless he hits the potential very few at this point think he has, it’s hard to picture this ever being a “bargain”. And not every contract needs to end up a bargain, but when it’s signed it should have some potential to be.
Yeah, I'm glad we avoided a 5-6 year, 25-30 mill deal with Lindolm. Guy's great, but not worth that.
Yeah that was my thought honestly.I don’t think he’s ever going to be anywhere near his draft potential. He hasn’t even shown a flash of it.
That said, he’s a guy you wouldn’t feel terrible having as the 3rd best guy on your top line, next to star players. It’s entirely possible that Flames fans are crowing about their “top line winger” this time next year, with him having scored a bunch of points he didn’t necessarily create. I think $5M is pretty close to market price for that sort of player, even now.
Reminds me a lot of the Jordan Staal contract. People flipped out at the time because he got point-scorer money without being a point scorer. But as time goes by, it’s proven to be a fair deal for what he actually brings to a hockey team.