I hope their internal investigations are nothing like law enforcement where the find they did nothing wrong at a near 100% rate.I meant their internal investigation. Think they'll send me the results?
I hope their internal investigations are nothing like law enforcement where the find they did nothing wrong at a near 100% rate.I meant their internal investigation. Think they'll send me the results?
Imagine Bedard or Fantilli being that center!Imagine how good Keller/Achmaltz line could be with a better center.
Yes and I'm stuck imagining it being Pinto and that it should be a right handed shot. Thought about Kupari as sleeper ( his fo% is up to 50.3 now). Dreamt about Scheifele, but woke up. And still believe it could be Reinhart, with a Gostisbehere tradeImagine how good Keller/Achmaltz line could be with a better center.
Bedard could produced on our 4th line and I would think about Fantilli with Guenther and Cooley and let them mature together.Imagine Bedard or Fantilli being that center!
That's our Government.I hope their internal investigations are nothing like law enforcement where the find they did nothing wrong at a near 100% rate.
I remember in my youth, we would call it a coverup, now they call it an investigation!That's our Government.
That was funny.I hope their internal investigations are nothing like law enforcement where the find they did nothing wrong at a near 100% rate.
The next morning…….
Is the article about the metaverse or facebooks attempt at their own version of a metaverse? I ask because the metaverse is no more a Facebook creation than the internet was an AOL creation. Zuckerberg marketing team hard at work trying to convince people the metaverse is exclusively a Facebook thing as if it'seven a remotely new thing. Hell Second Life has been around for like 20 years!The Wall Street Journal has made their tech predictions for 2023, and they say this time we REALLY mean it...this will be the year the Metaverse takes off. Maybe I'm just old, but I don't see the point. I'm not anti-VR, as I can foresee numerous uses of the tech, but the Zuckerberg vision of people spending large portions of their life in the Metaverse just doesn't sound very appealing.
My Southwest flight yesterday, Orlando-Austin-Phoenix (no plane change)....was 10 minutes early, and when I attempted to use my drink coupon to pay for my beer the FA said "naw, I gotcha". And my checked bag was one of the first ones out. Could scarcely have gone better.Southwest was the champion of failure last week but I was delayed 5 hours by American and we were never provided with a clear explanation which was annoying.
They have a lot of ass kissing to do that’s for sure!My Southwest flight yesterday, Orlando-Austin-Phoenix (no plane change)....was 10 minutes early, and when I attempted to use my drink coupon to pay for my beer the FA said "naw, I gotcha". And my checked bag was one of the first ones out. Could scarcely have gone better.
My Southwest flight yesterday, Orlando-Austin-Phoenix (no plane change)....was 10 minutes early, and when I attempted to use my drink coupon to pay for my beer the FA said "naw, I gotcha". And my checked bag was one of the first ones out. Could scarcely have gone better.
Is the article about the metaverse or facebooks attempt at their own version of a metaverse? I ask because the metaverse is no more a Facebook creation than the internet was an AOL creation. Zuckerberg marketing team hard at work trying to convince people the metaverse is exclusively a Facebook thing as if it'seven a remotely new thing. Hell Second Life has been around for like 20 years!
Like their CEO said, the system works 99% of the time. He said it as if that was a high number, but for IT systems a 1% failure rate is abysmal. It means 3.5 days per year, SW will meltdown and leave you stranded.
Assume it's a strategy built around operating with lesser costs the rest of the year and hoping it doesn't get noticeably out of control at the holidays/blizzards. 99% of the time it's a valid business model that doesn't run into issues due to operating this way, but they face the consequences of looking like they are a disaster when they knowingly get into a situation like this.Like their CEO said, the system works 99% of the time. He said it as if that was a high number, but for IT systems a 1% failure rate is abysmal. It means 3.5 days per year, SW will meltdown and leave you stranded.
Assume it's a strategy built around operating with lesser costs the rest of the year and hoping it doesn't get noticeably out of control at the holidays/blizzards. 99% of the time it's a valid business model that doesn't run into issues due to operating this way, but they face the consequences of looking like they are a disaster when they knowingly get into a situation like this.