...
If you are playing your ridiculous semantics like that the only definition of a pay cut is taking less than his elc then thats just stupid . Go read the dictionary. It’s a broader term than that. Lol it’s says reducing pay or Salary it doesn’t say reduce from your previous contract. Lol
I don't think I'd call Boeser a playoff performer. He struggled early in that playoff run, but did play better towards the end of the St. Louis series and in the Vegas series.No (unpopular opinion). Please don’t trade playoff performers, unless they really going full rebuild mode.
What's hilarious here is that you're totally lost here and fail to see that you're wrong. Accusing me of being hilarious or using ridiculous semantics just makes you look silly.
Using your definition, everyone took a pay cut to sign here. Are you saying well done Jim Benning? According to you, Myers took a "pay cut" to sign here. So did Eriksson. So did Roussel and Beagle. That's what you're saying here which is just stupid.
I understand that you intended to use "pay cut" as accepting less than could have been obtained, but that isn't the plain use of the words.
If someone makes $1,867,500 playing hockey for the 2018-19 season and $4,000,000 playing hockey for the 2019-20 season, he has pretty clearly received a pay increase. It makes no sense when getting a pay increase to say the player took a pay cut.
A change from $1,867,500 to $4,000,000 is not a reduction in pay, it is an increase and yes, the baseline is what was being paid immediately before the change.
Your point may be valid-but the way you stated it isn't.
Good point. The Canucks could take him to arbitration without making a qualifying offer. If the arbitration award was higher than the team would be prepared to pay, the Canucks could walk away, making him a free agent-so he's entitled to a minimum of $6.375 million (the minimum allowable arbitration award-85% of his salary this season) or free agency this summer.
It's an improvement, though still a drag on the value of his contract to a team acquiring him at this season's trade deadline.
It’s kinda expected for players to be not in form for the play in. Playin!=playoffsI don't think I'd call Boeser a playoff performer. He struggled early in that playoff run, but did play better towards the end of the St. Louis series and in the Vegas series.
Doesn’t matter though the point still stands. Which is why I used hair cut as well and not just pay cut. So I proved nothing for you like you are hilariously trying to stupidly spin that you somehow win on a technicality lol
I understand that you intended to use "pay cut" as accepting less than could have been obtained, but that isn't the plain use of the words.
If someone makes $1,867,500 playing hockey for the 2018-19 season and $4,000,000 playing hockey for the 2019-20 season, he has pretty clearly received a pay increase. It makes no sense when getting a pay increase to say the player took a pay cut.
A change from $1,867,500 to $4,000,000 is not a reduction in pay, it is an increase and yes, the baseline is what was being paid immediately before the change.
Your point may be valid-but the way you stated it isn't.
Lol taking less money than he wanted isn’t the exact definition of a taking pay cut? You are hilarious.