Joe McGrath
Registered User
- Oct 29, 2009
- 18,174
- 38,296
^ Yeah but when you draft bums like Lindholm over Monahan and set your franchise back another 5 years it's a real problem.
^ Yeah but when you draft bums like Lindholm over Monahan and set your franchise back another 5 years it's a real problem.
If you recall, the thought of passing on a few different guys for Monahan was considered anathema to the vast majority of the draft gurus on this board. Mostly because he is Canadian and is considered "gritty."
I don't recall exactly, but wasn't the general thinking back then was that Monahan was the "safe" JR type pick and a lot of posters wanted Nichushkin at the time? I'm too lazy to check.
I do remember a draft video of Rutherford back then trying to make a trade for Jones, and when that didn't work out, he turned to either Francis or MacDonald and said something to the effect of "Well, were going to get your guy". I just can't remember who he said that to. Does anyone else remember that?
You can read the "We're going to get your guy." two ways...they're happy Lindholm's there at #5 or with the resignation that they missed out on the guys he wanted and they're going with the default selection (Lindholm) they disagree on, as there is no other considered option (edit: meaning they'd already decided "not Monahan") on the board.
Forget Jarnkok.
Small'ish mid 20's forwards yet to show NHL talent are what we're trying to get away from. In a perfect world, we'll have 0 of those on the team next year.
The thing with Lindholm's development, is that he did. His 19yo year was a nice step forward. So I'm not buying the 'ruined him' stuff. Hopefully, he just came out of the gate slow, and will get going now.