Any Number you shouldn't be?

[Hockeyfan68]

I'm not really a chirper, but I'm not a fan of using those two numbers.

Well to give an example I have been chirped on another hockey board before for having 68 in my username. It somehow meant I loved Jagr when in truth it was the year I was born.

Obviously 99 would not be a year someone was born but 66 very well could be.

It isn't all that big of deal, I have seen it all over the years and know what you mean but it is fun that someone would have their idol on a jersey.

It doesn't mean necessarily that they think they themselves are God's gift to hockey.

I loved Cam Neely and would wear number 8 for that reason, it would mean I was bragging and claiming to be as good as him. That would be silly since .... I am in a beer league.

 

[krax]

Obviously 99 would not be a year someone was born but 66 very well could be.

I think players born in 1999 will definitely be born in '99

It's not that far away to see them cracking the NHL rosters.

 

[jax00]

Our goalie wears: ln(e). They officially list him as #1.

He is the son of a math teacher, so its understandable.

 

[Heat McManus]

Our goalie wears: ln(e). They officially list him as #1.

He is the son of a math teacher, so its understandable.

I saw a guy with:

i'm pretty sure he was a mathematician or physicist.

 

[cptjeff]

Our goalie wears: ln(e). They officially list him as #1.

He is the son of a math teacher, so its understandable.

I like it.

 

[Giroux tha Damaja]

Our goalie wears: ln(e). They officially list him as #1.

He is the son of a math teacher, so its understandable.

The natural log of e [ln(e)] is equal to one, so that makes perfect sense.