Finished?Are they more or less loyal than Austrians? What about Belgians? How about honesty? Are Finns more or less likely to cheat you than someone from Denmark? What about Poland?
I hadn't seen this 5 mins in the Box segment with Tyson prior to today. It's worth the watch if you haven't seen it, particularly the part where he talks about being in the Finnish army.
The focus for the coyotes is to improve defensively to minimize raanta's injuries. The more positional saves he has to make, the less injuries he will have.Raanta's contract could be one of the biggest steals in the league the next three years. If his career numbers do not regress seeing full time action that could be an amazing contract. Congrats to both sides, but man Chayka pulls another rabbit out of the hat.
It looks like that for the outside, but like Cobra and a few others have said, he is still not proven as a starter and we have no idea what kind of injuries he had. I really don't think Chayka pulled one out of the hat at all, rather he just payed market value. I would say both parties are happy with the deal.Raanta's contract could be one of the biggest steals in the league the next three years. If his career numbers do not regress seeing full time action that could be an amazing contract. Congrats to both sides, but man Chayka pulls another rabbit out of the hat.
Staying healthy on D would be the main focus for me. We need more talent on D in case of injuries like this year. Raanta's not big but very athletic, so he is always active in net, like Quick, and those types are probably more injury prone than a big goalie. Mind you, Bishop, Price, Smith and others have had their fair share of injuries.The focus for the coyotes is to improve defensively to minimize raanta's injuries. The more positional saves he has to make, the less injuries he will have.
I think Raanta got market value. If Raanta is injured or his play fades when he plays full time, the contract won't kill us. I hope you are right and it looks like a steal the next few years though.Raanta's contract could be one of the biggest steals in the league the next three years. If his career numbers do not regress seeing full time action that could be an amazing contract. Congrats to both sides, but man Chayka pulls another rabbit out of the hat.
Agreed... but the point is that the more routine saves cause less injury. A lot of that is defence. If a goalie has to make a lot of movement because dmen are losing their assignments, its injury city.Staying healthy on D would be the main focus for me. We need more talent on D in case of injuries like this year. Raanta's not big but very athletic, so he is always active in net, like Quick, and those types are probably more injury prone than a big goalie. Mind you, Bishop, Price, Smith and others have had their fair share of injuries.
I think Raanta got market value. If Raanta is injured or his play fades when he plays full time, the contract won't kill us. I hope you are right and it looks like a steal the next few years though.
I'm happy with the contract. I didn't think he would get 4 mill and 4 years or way more as some had predicted. 4.25 and 3 years is fine, glad it is signed and done.I thought market value for you was much less. And I'm pretty sure his market value is higher, if we judge it by how much he would get, if he chose to test market in July. Maybe something like 0.5M more.
But the real thing. Are you happy with this contract? You talked about much less whole time and even when it was "roughly 4" you said, it's most likely under 4.
You bet, but term scares me more as that can make trading a player almost impossible, unless you add good assets or retain.I think Raanta got market value. If Raanta is injured or his play fades when he plays full time, the contract won't kill us. I hope you are right and it looks like a steal the next few years though.
I am glad Chayka is careful with contracts in dollars, term and NMC clauses. Bad contracts are how teams get stuck and we don't have any at the moment. We are going to pay OEL 8/8 and I would be fine with Tavares long term too. You can pay your superstars money/term. Keller is the only other player on our roster we will have to pay big money in the next 5 years if his performance continues.
You have to be careful with the good but not great players like Lucic and for us Domi maybe in the future. If we can stay under 4-5 mill per year, if the player doesn't work out it won't kill you. I think teams get in trouble in the 5.5-7.5 range, good but not great players. When they fade it kills your cap.
He basically got the Talbot deal, glad its not 4 years like Darling.You bet, but term scares me more as that can make trading a player almost impossible, unless you add good assets or retain.
I was not talking Raanta but term in general. These 8 yr contract scare the hell out of me.He basically got the Talbot deal, glad its not 4 years like Darling.
Me too, but term for UFA's is a function of the CBA model. ELC's get under paid with not much term. RFA's get under paid, unless the GM is stupid, with not much term unless it eats up some UFA years. UFA's get over paid in dollars and term. I would stay away from term and big money unless it is a proven 1C/1D Tavares/Kopitar, Daughty/OEL, elite wing/Patrick Kane. If the player isn't in one of those categories, you have to be careful.I was not talking Raanta but term in general. These 8 yr contract scare the hell out of me.