TheLegend
Hardly Deactivated
Agree. Although the Hawks are who I root for when I'm not cheering the Yotes, having $21 million tied up in two players (30% of cap!) will probable come back to haunt Chicago.
Was watching NHLN's pre-season shows last night and they came to a similar conclusion... those two huge salaries are going to kick in next season and without cap relief the we might see at least one of them moved.
I think Hockey is one of those sports where superstars have less impact than perhaps the other major American sports.
For one, a top forward might be on the ice for only 1/3 of the game. Lebron James' average minutes equate to 65% of the game.
A star quarterback can be the difference between winning and losing.
In baseball, the best pitcher in the league certainly doesn't guarantee winning a playoff series (Dodgers!?), but can win games for you when the offense tanks, similar to a hot goaltender I suppose.
Bottom line, my comment about Kane was in jest, as I too would rather have the production of four $6 mil level forwards, vs the Kane/Toews combo. Not trying to dis the Chicago studs, just think they overpaid for the amount of production and wins that will result.
Saw an interesting nugget on my twitter feed the other day The Dodgers, Angels and Tigers had a combined payroll of $550 million and were virtually swept out of the playoffs by teams with payrolls totaling $310 million.
Moneyball is alive and well.