- Sep 28, 2014
- 76,757
- 123,325
Yes, but "big" is a very nebulous way of characterizing the relative impact of his presence here.
My point is that, especially in hockey, there are so many variables at play that any single one (eg, Voracek being in the lineup) explains only a sliver of the outcomes. I mean, how much of that drop do you think is due to Voracek? 5%? 10%? It's can't be much more than that because there are so many other factors (eg, PP failure, fatigue, lineup decisions, uncontrollable factors for the opposition, etc.) at play here. Even if Voracek is the single "biggest" of those factors, it really isn't enough by itself to explain the drop.
That's why I take issue with people who choose to use one issue as a scapegoat for such struggles. It's an easy target. And it's one worth discussing, but I think it's beaten to death and drastically overstated by some.
FWIW, by my evaluation, fatigue is the single biggest factor right now, not Voracek.
I get what you're saying and I appreciate the well thought-out explanation for it.
You're probably right about fatigue. Other issues have been our mediocre defense coming back down to Earth and being exposed, probably because they aren't getting enough support from the forwards due to fatigue, and a struggling powerplay.