Correct me if I am wrong but prime Volchenkov never had good hands, was a smooth skater or was good at breakouts which has been touted for Bahl ever since his rise after the draft.
Look at those silky smooth hands.
Correct me if I am wrong but prime Volchenkov never had good hands, was a smooth skater or was good at breakouts which has been touted for Bahl ever since his rise after the draft.
I still wouldn't say Hall coming back to the Devils is completely out of the picture. Obviously a lot has to happen, but if the Devils can pull bolster the prospect pool with even more prospects, get a legitimate coach (Boudreau, Cooper, Laviolette), and maybe flip some assets into another top pairing defender, I could see Hall giving the Devils another shot.
real simple way to analyze the trade and the returns. ask yourself if the situation was reversed would you have wanted shero to trade smith for hall? or whoever our #2 prospect is for him as a rental? if the answer is no then there you go
Look at those silky smooth hands.
Pronman doesn't have Soderstrom rated a lot higher than Bahl. He's got them both in the "Very Good/Legit Prospect" range and had Soderstrom at #102 and Bahl at #113 in his preseason rankings.
Trying to do reading up on Bahl and watch some clips it seems like he’s pretty divisive. One article talked about some scouts really see him as a guy who controls a game defensively in the NHL and other scouts see an NHL future where he plays ok defense and doesn’t help you out anywhere else.
So I get people hearing the latter and not being excited over Bahl but it feels, to me, like he’s getting underrated as a prospect due to being a second round pick and not having good counting numbers. Hopefully he’ll look good at the WJC and that’ll relieve a bit of some people’s stress(even though a short tournament is a bad way to judge players).
Trying to do reading up on Bahl and watch some clips it seems like he’s pretty divisive. One article talked about some scouts really see him as a guy who controls a game defensively in the NHL and other scouts see an NHL future where he plays ok defense and doesn’t help you out anywhere else.
So I get people hearing the latter and not being excited over Bahl but it feels, to me, like he’s getting underrated as a prospect due to being a second round pick and not having good counting numbers. Hopefully he’ll look good at the WJC and that’ll relieve a bit of some people’s stress(even though a short tournament is a bad way to judge players).
I've never seen him play so WJC is a showcase for me. Hope he blows us away.
We really need someone like a Colton Parayko, really hope Bahl can be that guy.
I’m concerned that he’s going to be a lumbering goon who has difficulty transitioning to pro hockey. It’s easy to beat up on kids. I know, he skates better than average for someone ‘his size’ but that doesn’t really provide much encouragement. People want him to be a potential Colton Parayko (or Chara? Or Zadorov I suppose?) but I don’t think the chances are that high.
I hope he does well but until proven otherwise I have very low expectations for him.
He did say "may not" which is very possible.It seems a bit extreme to write off the pick(s) and prospects we got before they've played a single game for the organization or have even been drafted.
I think he has the attributes of being a new generation big man. In that he skates pretty well and can constructively move the puck up ice.Bahl is precisely the type of defenseman that all the, "new NHL" people hate.
Which, of course, means I love this addition.
Mostly what I’ve seen says he’s a fine skater in general and then an impressive skater for his size.
Also, it seems he’s focused on breaking up plays using his stick and reach and not strength. So I don’t think he’s on Team Canada just because he’s so big.
Every prospect may have trouble transitioning but I don’t know why you would have “very low” expectations for him compared to any other prospect around his level unless you had a lot of personal viewings. For me, that’s just being negative to be negative.
Mostly what I’ve seen says he’s a fine skater in general and then an impressive skater for his size.
Also, it seems he’s focused on breaking up plays using his stick and reach and not strength. So I don’t think he’s on Team Canada just because he’s so big.
Every prospect may have trouble transitioning but I don’t know why you would have “very low” expectations for him compared to any other prospect around his level unless you had a lot of personal viewings. For me, that’s just being negative to be negative.
I think he has the attributes of being a new generation big man. In that he skates pretty well and can constructively move the puck up ice.
What is interesting though is that prior to last years draft, Shero was known for coveting smaller puck movers, but since last years draft(maybe even in the year prior with Bernard) he has targeted d-men who are big guys and more defensively oriented.
And he has been criticized a bit for it.
Look at those silky smooth hands.
I’m not being negative just to be negative, I would love to be wrong.
It’s more from what I see as jumping on the bandwagon of what’s currently ‘it’ in the league. Happens in every sport. A few smaller, faster players have success, so teams fall all over themselves to get anything resembling the new ‘prototypical’ shiny toy. Now a team with bigger, stronger defensemen won and so we’re going to try and find the ‘next’ one of those.
Rather than copy the latest trends, I’d rather see the team have a steady plan or idea of what they want - a well-balanced group with some speed and some size but with solid hockey skills.
I’ll admit, I’m biased against tiny players as well as giants because the ones who are successful are outliers and to me it’s like taking a low-chance shot at a homerun. I’d rather go for multiple higher level chances of hitting a lot of doubles.
Ray is doing exactly what your want. We have a surplus of small, offensive minded puck moving dmen. He goes out and acquires a big body, defensive minded dman to compliment what we already have.
I don’t understand your concern if our Gm is doing everything in his power to balance offense with defence, something we clearly don’t have atm.
Do you feel this way with all players in the Juniors? Bahl might not be a blue chip prospect but he's not a marginal one either, many feel his potential is top 4.My concern is that Bahl isn’t an answer.
When posters say we want more players with size on the team, we’re not interested in bigger players just for the sake of it. I just want players who are still skilled and less likely to be bullied like the midgets. For now this just seems like an over correction the other way, grabbing a huge defender just because he’s 6’6” and has put up some points in juniors. If he’d played and had success against pro players I’d probably be more comfortable. Until he does, I’m keeping my expectations low with the hope I’ll be wrong. I’m just not counting on him turning into anything....maybe a bottom pairing if we’re lucky.
Trying to do reading up on Bahl and watch some clips it seems like he’s pretty divisive. One article talked about some scouts really see him as a guy who controls a game defensively in the NHL and other scouts see an NHL future where he plays ok defense and doesn’t help you out anywhere else.
So I get people hearing the latter and not being excited over Bahl but it feels, to me, like he’s getting underrated as a prospect due to being a second round pick and not having good counting numbers. Hopefully he’ll look good at the WJC and that’ll relieve a bit of some people’s stress(even though a short tournament is a bad way to judge players).