IDuck
Registered User
- Sep 26, 2007
- 11,214
- 1,007
thought parros had the better one, "the sweedish hammer"...hahahaha
Manson 24:53
Fowler 23:59
Vatanen 23:11
Despres 22:50
Lindholm 22:40
Bieksa 2:32
I like that it is balanced after Bieksa got out. Shows you can rely on all. Despres had a few bad turnovers, but overall defense was very solid.
yep oingo boingo and I am old.
They locked in down in the last half of the game
Getzlaf 8/16 - 50%
Kesler 13/22 - 59%
Santorelli 1/2 - 50%
Ritchie 0/1 - 0%
Thompson 0/4 - 0%
Rakell 8/14 - 57%
WTF, Rakell. Bring that more frequently please.
They were 13/27 in the defensive zone, which is actually pretty darned good with the new rules. The Kings were 9/17.
Was "Little Girls" taken?
Am I missing something?So Lindholm injured his knee in the first period?
So Lindholm injured his knee in the first period?
Despite the winning streak, I feel like the team hasn't quite been that good the past few games.Few notes on a game.
Despite the win, im not pleased with our game, we won but long term that not how you go deep.
Whats worries me is that Kings achieved everything from their to do list, cycle the puck, piss of Getz, easy D zone entry, lots of penalties which disrupt our game flow...
They lost yesterday mainly because of bad shot accuracy...
Few notes on a game.
Despite the win, im not pleased with our game, we won but long term that not how you go deep.
Whats worries me is that Kings achieved everything from their to do list, cycle the puck, piss of Getz, easy D zone entry, lots of penalties which disrupt our game flow...
They lost yesterday mainly because of bad shot accuracy...
Rakell getting better with his only face-off move or is he changing it up? Didn't pay attention to his faceoffs this game.
Few notes on a game.
Despite the win, im not pleased with our game, we won but long term that not how you go deep.
Whats worries me is that Kings achieved everything from their to do list, cycle the puck, piss of Getz, easy D zone entry, lots of penalties which disrupt our game flow...
They lost yesterday mainly because of bad shot accuracy...
I'm not worried about LA. We control our own destiny when/if we ever face them in the playoffs. IMO, the only team that ANA should be concerned about going into the playoffs is CHI.
He played nearly 23 mins ....
If the Kings get healthy (Gaborik mainly), and get more from Carter and Toffoli than they are right now, they will give us all we can handle. That said, I agree that we are as good as them or maybe even better in terms of depth. But as you said, it's up to the team to avoid their patented meltdowns, that's what worries me more than the opposing roster. This team can hang if they don't go full headless chicken.
Nashville is formidable, a series with the Sharks could give us fits, a healthy Blues team shouldn't be taken lightly, either.
Some "expert" on twitter said that he hurt his knee in the first period and then played through it the rest of the game, since Bieksa was already gone.
I heard that too. He took that leg hit several games ago, too. Hopefully unrelated...I remember Hazy mentioning something about Lindholm kinda lingering his way down the tunnel and how he wasn't 100%, is my brain dumb or does anyone else remember hearing that?