Claimed off Waivers: [ANA] Ducks claim F Ross Johnston off waivers from the Islanders

lwvs84

Registered User
Jan 25, 2003
4,119
2,811
Los Angeles, CA
For those interested, this cost Anaheim $11,250, paid to New York and not counted against the cap.



Season total: $478,125
11 claims
Different players seem to have a different cost to claiming teams. How do they determine that cost? Just curious, because it didn't seem to be based on how much the player makes.
 
  • Like
Reactions: kevistar

uncleben

Global Moderator
Dec 4, 2008
14,269
8,689
Acton, Ontario
Different players seem to have a different cost to claiming teams. How do they determine that cost? Just curious, because it didn't seem to be based on how much the player makes.
It's based off of their years of pro experience under contract
Players with less experience cost more
 
  • Like
Reactions: lwvs84

McDonald19

Registered User
Sep 9, 2003
22,984
3,849
California
The idea that goons actually protected guys back in the day has little evidence to support it. In today's game it's comically absurd. There were numerous times where Ross would confront a guy and the refs (knowing he was a goon) would give him a game misconduct as a preemptive strike.
Maybe not nowadays, but in the past hall of famers such as Wayne Gretzky and Teemu Selanne have spoken positively about the protection they received from enforcers.
 

SI90

Registered User
Jul 25, 2011
85,731
63,388
StrongIsland
The Boss is a beast. 25-30 years ago he would’ve been very popular and probably played close to 1000 games. Don’t get it twisted if you want him to get plugs deep and play real hockey, he can he just wont add offense.
 

robbieboy3686

Registered User
Jan 17, 2016
2,838
1,903
The Boss is a beast. 25-30 years ago he would’ve been very popular and probably played close to 1000 games. Don’t get it twisted if you want him to get plugs deep and play real hockey, he can he just wont add offense.
He skates well, from what your fans have said. Is that correct ?
 

TheFinalWord

Registered User
Apr 25, 2005
2,185
809
The idea that goons actually protected guys back in the day has little evidence to support it. In today's game it's comically absurd. There were numerous times where Ross would confront a guy and the refs (knowing he was a goon) would give him a game misconduct as a preemptive strike.
I remember a team that had a goalie that was run twice in a short period of time. The first time was really bad, the second less so. That team went out and got this monster enforcer, and I don't remember that goalie being run again.

Now the trouble with determining the impact of toughness, is that when it works, you don't see it. So while I agree, some of these super heavyweights are almost useless, because the smaller pests aren't going to fight them, having a tougher lineup definitely serves as a deterrent (to some extent). Team toughness is better than a goon.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad