If Allen can't show up I know who is the guy who gets opportunity to play NHL level. Husso's style fits perfectly on Blues defense, you could say he isn't that good level yet compare to Allen, but stylistically it makes Husso better then Allen.
Given the circumstances and putting everything into context, it's hardly cherry picking.Umm, no. One game doesn't make a season. I can go back and cherry pick two dozen other games where a defenseman or forward screwed up and failed to pot a goal, or got beaten for a goal, etc. Jake was part of the overall problem last season, not THE problem.
Given the circumstances and putting everything into context, it's hardly cherry picking.
We had three games remaining and needed 3 points to clinch a spot. We go into the 80th game of the year and had a 3-1 lead in the THIRD period only for Allen to piss it away and then with 8.5 seconds left, it's gone. In a game that was as close to must win as it can get, that's inexcusable.
That's a much different circumstance than any other game from like February or November or something.
The one thing that stuck out to me from last year was there where games that it seemed the team gave up on Allen, when he was in goal. You could see the disappointment on their faces when he let in a softy... I hope he can bounce back without him we may struggle or Husso may step up and say its my team now not later we will not know until camp...
Yep, I don't know that the team played any harder for Carter Hutton but they sure played more confident. When the Blues fell behind with Hutton in net, the demeanor of the team didn't go right into the toilet. It's like the offense became snake-bit when Jake let in a bad goal. That needs to change but there are still a lot of the same guys, especially on the defensive side, that "know" Allen by now. If the team can't play mentally-tough in front of their goalie, then the only solution may be to replace that goalie. Coaches can lose a room...I'd be surprised if teammates can't as well.
Nobody likes to be called a head case. No matter how much or how little you make. Also, I’m sure most people do not like to openly admit they are seeing a psychiatrist as it can be used against them for going out and seeking help. Sports head issues typically lie within confisdence issues. A lot of the best athletes you will find are very very good at trusting their instincts and acting on their instincts coupled with the skill that they have developed. Seeing as how Jake has a tremndous amount of skill as a goalie, and inconsistency is essentially the issue. I think it is fairly to say that it is either confidence or focus that he is lacking. A sports psych is a good place to start with that. I don’t think it’s right that we speculate on his decision to hide what he would like to hide in his own personal life, regardless if he makes $25,000 a year or 5 million.
Dealing with the media and fans is part of a professional athletes job. It can be tough, but that is part of the reason they are so well compensated. So the amount of money he makes doesn't matter except that it is part of the trade off his job entails. When you sign a multi-million dollar contract, it comes with the expectation of increased scrutiny. If you don't want the scrutiny, don't sign the contract. The fans are paying for a product and they want to make sure the product they are paying for is of as high quality as possible. But yes, there are limits to what a fan/customer should be able to ask. Many take it way too far. Saying a player has a weak mental game is not taking it to far.
Nor is going too far to speculate on what changes he made in his off-season program when he specifically mentions he made changes. That's the weird thing. How he mentioned it. If he said "You are always looking to improve, and changing some things up is a natural part of that, but for the most part my routine will be the same." Nobody thinks twice about a comment like that. Instead he said "’I'm not going to get into it too much, but there’s definitely a different mantra for me this summer...I'm definitely trying a new approach this summer..." and then didn't give any more info at all. He starts very defensively "I'm not going to get into it" which immediately peaks interest, then talks about a whole new approach, not merely a tweak. He said this to a reporter for an article knowing it was going to be reported. If he didn't want people speculating, don't lay it out there like that. You are just encouraging speculation.
Also, this was not speculation about his personal life. It was something, the seems to have been recommended by the blues. So its effecting his job performance, which we are the customers for. If he was seeing a shrink because he can't be intimate with his wife or girlfriend, then yea, that's personal. But the question was if he is doing anything different to prepare for the upcoming year at his very public job.
Finally, if you all want to take up a pool to pay me $4 million a year, you can call me a headcase or whatever name you so choose, and you can speculate what I would talk about with my shrink to your hearts content. Hell, if you are paying me $4M a year to play a game, I'll rehash every childhood trauma in great detail if you want.
He singlehandedly cost us the playoffs last year. All he had to do was stop a Duncan Keith muffin from the blue line with NO screen in front.
I said it.
Cause it's the god damn truth.
So I don't give a **** what he does in the summer. He better not collapse mid season again. I'm sick of his ****.
I have zero faith in him as a goalie. He's never showed any true signs of being a competent #1 and has been average or slightly below average for all but 1 season. So until he legitimately takes on 55+ games where he's consistent and puts at least .915 I have no reason to have any hope he's capable of being the guy.
Given the circumstances and putting everything into context, it's hardly cherry picking.
We had three games remaining and needed 3 points to clinch a spot. We go into the 80th game of the year and had a 3-1 lead in the THIRD period only for Allen to piss it away and then with 8.5 seconds left, it's gone. In a game that was as close to must win as it can get, that's inexcusable.
That's a much different circumstance than any other game from like February or November or something.
I'm going to hold on to this post for a year end analysis lolI don't know what he has been doing over the summer, nor do I care. Allen has all the talent in the world, but if he can't put it together for a season ( which he has shown that he can't, be it through lower pro leagues and tournaments or NHL) he needs to go. I don't care if he is bought out, traded, or LTIR ala Chicago or LA, i want him gone. he is going to disappoint this year, just like every god damned year prior. Goaltending has LONG been the Blues biggest issue, and management has continually made the wrong decision on which goaltender to keep/play for 30+ years. How a team ****s up the most important position for so long despite different management boggles my mind.
I'm glad to hear this report. I hope it will make a real difference in how he performs this season. The Blues' added firepower and depth should, at least, make it easier on Allen, so that he'll be less likely to tire physically and mentally. So, I look for substantial improvement from him EVEN if the different preparation has little effect.This article leads me to believe it could be one of two things. The first and mostly likely scenario is that Jake is seeing a psychologist or some kind of mentality coach. The second could be that Army pushed him to train a specific way this off-season (a different coach, attend a certain camp, maintaining a routine/certain schedule).
I would imagine it involves some sort of mentality coach and believe that could make a big difference. Although the summer isn't long enough to fix any and all of Jake's issues, it does provide time to learn a few strategies/tactics that may help with maintaining his composure when he does hit those rough patches that would normally shake his confidence. There is also a chance that his psychologist is in St. Louis and he will be able to continue seeing him throughout the season or is available via phone/video chat in the event that Jake needed to talk.
The fact that Jake is saying that it is going better than he expected is a positive sign. If he continue's to "buy in" to whatever he is doing, it could pay off huge for both him and the team.
It is going to be interesting to see what happens from mid-December through Janurary...
Jeremy Rutherford posted an article a few days ago that I found fascinating, as much for what it didn't say as what it did. Here is the link for those with an athletic subscription.
To summarize for those without a subscription. Jake Allen was not worried at all he would be traded this off-season. “I don’t know if I should get into that,” Allen said. “I knew I was coming back." Rutherford thinks there was an implication that Armstrong gave him this assurance. However, the Blues straight up told him he needed to be more consistent.
Initially after the season Allen told reporters that he wouldn't make any changes to his summer routine. Now he told JR, he did make a change. But here is the weird thing, he would not say what that change was. He even indicated it wasn't his idea, and he didn't think it would work. Although now he is happy about it. JR, and myself, think he is talking to a sports shrink.
The rest of the article is making excuses for him, talking about the lack of goal-scoring and how he is only bad for a few weeks a year.
I think there is a lot here to unpack and discuss, hence why I made its own thread.
1) It seems Armstrong didn't even kick the tires on a different goalie. Is that the right move?
2) Do you think Allen's seeing a psychologist? If not, then what? If so, is that what he needs?
3) Why the big secrecy?
4) Allen makes some quotes about what he needs to do to be successful, are those reassuring to you?
5) Can Allen be a good goalie? What does he need?
Jeremy Rutherford posted an article a few days ago that I found fascinating, as much for what it didn't say as what it did. Here is the link for those with an athletic subscription.
To summarize for those without a subscription. Jake Allen was not worried at all he would be traded this off-season. “I don’t know if I should get into that,” Allen said. “I knew I was coming back." Rutherford thinks there was an implication that Armstrong gave him this assurance. However, the Blues straight up told him he needed to be more consistent.
Initially after the season Allen told reporters that he wouldn't make any changes to his summer routine. Now he told JR, he did make a change. But here is the weird thing, he would not say what that change was. He even indicated it wasn't his idea, and he didn't think it would work. Although now he is happy about it. JR, and myself, think he is talking to a sports shrink.
The rest of the article is making excuses for him, talking about the lack of goal-scoring and how he is only bad for a few weeks a year.
I think there is a lot here to unpack and discuss, hence why I made its own thread.
1) It seems Armstrong didn't even kick the tires on a different goalie. Is that the right move?
2) Do you think Allen's seeing a psychologist? If not, then what? If so, is that what he needs?
3) Why the big secrecy?
4) Allen makes some quotes about what he needs to do to be successful, are those reassuring to you?
5) Can Allen be a good goalie? What does he need?
Can we at least agree that Jake Allen is a 1B and not the Starter Golden Boy that many expected?
If we can also agree that he still could be in the future and to totally write him off would be dumb