All-Time Wrestling Draft - Deadline for cards on August 11th

[Morozov]

Also having another year of teams sounds cool to mix things up a bit.

 

[Habsrule]

I am in for a third year in a row.

 

[CHGoalie27]

The big...
question...
that we all want to know...
is if...
he will be summoned again...
the poster...
the myth...
the legend...
with no name...
the one...
the only...

You vs frank caliendo should be a great match

 

[HandsomeHollywood]

You vs frank caliendo should be a great match

The disrespect...

 

[CHGoalie27]

The disrespect...

That wasnt an insult lol

 

[Le Barron de HF]

We'd be over my projected number of 16 participants. There are two options to test out for now, either we do the format where we get a couple of triple threats (3 way) in the opening round or if some would like to pair up with another poster, it's the other option!

 

[HandsomeHollywood]

We'd be over my projected number of 16 participants. There are two options to test out for now, either we do the format where we get a couple of triple threats (3 way) in the opening round or if some would like to pair up with another poster, it's the other option!

I'm for either option. I'd rather stay solo.

 

[les Habs]

Considering we have 19 participants if I'm not mistaken, say we get one more we could have two draft groups of ten each. Then have a "group stage" where everyone votes for their 8 favorite cards from that group. Then you could seed cards based on pick order or just randomize them. Then after that you have brackets? That way you don't have to mess with teams or triple threats.

 

[Disclose]

if there are too many people maybe have "champions/previous winners" have a BYE on the first round.
i dont like the triple treat idea.
(i dont mind the team idea)
(im also not playing. just giving ideas lol)

 

[HandsomeHollywood]

Considering we have 19 participants if I'm not mistaken, say we get one more we could have two draft groups of ten each. Then have a "group stage" where everyone votes for their 8 favorite cards from that group. Then you could seed cards based on pick order or just randomize them. Then after that you have brackets? That way you don't have to mess with teams or triple threats.

This is what we did 2 years ago and it worked pretty well.
I'm pretty much for any format that makes it easier on Cutter.

 

[JackSlater]

I have no problem at all with a triple threat or two. I'll volunteer to be in one if the time comes. I'd prefer to not do two pools though, at least unless the number of people goes up by a fair bit. I prefer bigger rounds so that you actually have to plan picks out more and dig a bit deeper later on. In the end though it does come down to whatever the so-called Tomas Tatahhh wants and that's fine.

 

[les Habs]

This is what we did 2 years ago and it worked pretty well.
I'm pretty much for any format that makes it easier on Cutter.

I remember the picks portion, but not the voting phase. I assume you had 16 participants then? Either way I think it makes sense for a few reasons:

• It's fair as everyone is subject to the same scenario/rules, not some with triple threat while others are not or some team cards and some solo cards.
• Picks shouldn't take as long (though make no mistake, I'm in this for the long haul if it's just one group) and hopefully would "flow" better.
• Should be pretty easy to manage.

Anyway, just a suggestion and this is @Tomas Tatahhh 's draft if you ask me so I'll go along with whatever.

 

[les Habs]

I have no problem at all with a triple threat or two. I'll volunteer to be in one if the time comes. I'd prefer to not do two pools though, at least unless the number of people goes up by a fair bit. I prefer bigger rounds so that you actually have to plan picks out more and dig a bit deeper later on. In the end though it does come down to whatever the so-called Tomas Tatahhh wants and that's fine.

Yeah, that's one drawback for me. I think it makes it easier on my opponents. If we could get a few more guys, and we probably could, maybe it turns out like last year. We're missing one guy from last year if I'm not mistaken and while I don't post here a ton there seem to be plenty of regulars who might be persuaded to join up.

 

[JackSlater]

I remember the picks portion, but not the voting phase. I assume you had 16 participants then? Either way I think it makes sense for a few reasons:

• It's fair as everyone is subject to the same scenario/rules, not some with triple threat while others are not or some team cards and some solo cards.
• Picks shouldn't take as long (though make no mistake, I'm in this for the long haul if it's just one group) and hopefully would "flow" better.
• Should be pretty easy to manage.

Anyway, just a suggestion and this is @Tomas Tatahhh 's draft if you ask me so I'll go along with whatever.

It was two pools of 11 and there was a voting phase where only the cards that received the most votes advanced to a one on one stage. The year before there were 20 participants and I believe that there was a similar stage where cards were placed into a pool and the top cards advanced to a one on one stage.

I am much more interested in the draft aspect than the voting aspect. A pool of 9 seems too small to me. The pools of 11 seemed too small as it was very easy to load up on main event talent, and the number of quality wrestlers only goes up by the year.

 

[les Habs]

I am much more interested in the draft aspect than the voting aspect. A pool of 9 seems too small to me. The pools of 11 seemed too small as it was very easy to load up on main event talent, and the number of quality wrestlers only goes up by the year.

Same here, but I also prefer to have my own card and since we do the voting/rounds thing I just think it's best if we're on the same playing field.

 

[Cor]

We'd be over my projected number of 16 participants. There are two options to test out for now, either we do the format where we get a couple of triple threats (3 way) in the opening round or if some would like to pair up with another poster, it's the other option!

@M.C.G. 31 is out

 

[M.C.G. 31]

@M.C.G. 31 is out

I never said I was in, you dummy

 

[Cor]

I never said I was in you dummy

I never said that you said that you were in.


I just said you were out.

 

[M.C.G. 31]

I never said that you said that you were in.


I just said you were out.

one day I'm gonna slap you upside the head

 

[CHGoalie27]

I never said I was in you dummy

One of you was in the other thats all we know

 

[M.C.G. 31]

One of you was in the other thats all we know

 

[Dr Pepper]

I never said I was in you dummy

One of you was in the other thats all we know

A little punctuation goes a long way, doesn't it?

"Let's eat, Grandma!"
or
"Let's eat Grandma!"

See the difference?

 

[M.C.G. 31]

Oh lord

 

[CHGoalie27]

Oh lord

Gettin biblical! Good goin @Cor

 

[GKJ]

A little punctuation goes a long way, doesn't it?

"Let's eat, Grandma!"
or
"Let's eat Grandma!"

See the difference?

One of my favorite synthpop bands