deadhead
Registered User
- Feb 26, 2014
- 49,215
- 21,617
Yeah, I look through journals too and that's largely how I immediately know your claim about PC Culture causing a deep dive in history scholarship is a heaping pile of garbage. It's false. Especially this notion that over the last 50 years things have gotten worse; that's just utterly laughable. What do you object to, the loss of Lost Cause historians justifying secession, pushing a falsified stats' rights narrative, justifying Jim Crow, and defending sharecropping?
Hint: If that is your conclusion on the state of the field, then you should do yourself a favor and stay out.
I didn't say things have gotten worse over 50 years, quite the opposite, things got much better from around 1970-2000, with a flood of articles and books that delved into much greater detail, the application of computers and statistical analysis, advancements in archeology, etc.
It's since 2000 that things have gone downhill, partially due to "publish or perish" pressure.
By 1970, there were no historians doing any of those things. The Lost Cause historians are way back in the past, like the 19th century - those espousing the Lost Cause since then have been Southern demagogues.
Now what was left in the High School textbooks around the country is a different matter.
Even the old doyens of southern history, C Vance Woodward, VO Key, didn't push those arguements (see Tom Watson: Agrarian Rebel, The Origins of the New South, etc.)
Revisionist history was in full force by the 1970s. A smattering in the 1960s was a flood by the 1970s
Genovese - Political Economy of Slavery, 1st ed, was 1961.
Time on the Cross, which created a whole cottage industry of analyses of the economics of slavery, came out in 1974.
Sharecropping is a complex issue, because it made sense for both sides of the bargain (given the pattern of land ownership, which was a result of the decision not to confiscate the Southern plantations after the Civil War) - nor did it "force" the sharecropper to grow cotton, there's a whole literature on the economics of sharecropping in the South.