I'm sure this has been brought up before, but is there a possibility the rivermen play a couple of games at the scottrade center? That'd be kind of cool..
Glad for the win, but I'd like to know how many times they've allowed at least 3 unanswered goals late in a game this season. They have lost a few games when they had a decent lead going into the third, and just collapsed. That needs to be cleaned up.
Reminds me of St. Louis a couple years ago.
I caught the last 30-ish minutes of the Rivermen game tonight. Prospect wise McRae was really strong in that time. He was playing on Hensick's wing and was firing shots from quality scoring areas left and right and scored in the shootout. Cole was solid in his own zone and stepped up into some nice offensive chances including an odd man rush created by Schwartz. Schwartz was good but was stuck with Murray and Shattock so some opportunities were wasted but he got the winning goal in the shootout. Fairchild, Grachev, and Andronov weren't bad, but they didn't stand out much either.
Even though McRae is strong on face offs I wonder if he has a better future on the wing where he can use his size.
I'm wondering, if they are trying to have Schwartz focus on his defensive game. Either that or they are hiding him with two defensive forwards?
stlweir said:Even though McRae is strong on face offs I wonder if he has a better future on the wing where he can use his size.
I don't know about "very good" speed. I remember McClement being pretty average, not that fast.McClement had very good speed, McRae has average+ speed.
Porter's speed is what they prefer I am guessing. I do like Cracknell though.I don't know about "very good" speed. I remember McClement being pretty average, not that fast.
Anyways, I don't have the numbers in front of me, but it seems like Schwartz must be pretty good in shootouts. Just by looking at the boxscores I've seen him score quite a bit in them. So that's good. And he's not too far off from being on a 50-point pace on an inconsistent Peoria team, so I would consider that to be good in his first year.
Also, this is just a question that I've been pondering, but why do the Blues have Chris Porter as their extra forward instead of Cracknell? I think Porter is a decent grinder but there can't be any doubt that Cracknell is the better player IMO. Wouldn't it be more beneficial to have him on the team as the extra forward than Porter? He fills a nice role and also has leadership qualities.
Cracknell is a little better on offence. But Porter is a LOT better on defence (and his offence is decent). He's still the better all-around player of the two.Porter's speed is what they prefer I am guessing. I do like Cracknell though.