Skelen
Registered User
- Jan 5, 2015
- 1,285
- 1,507
no doubt we will miss McAvoy in 6-7 years
does the deal help us enough in the next 3 years to make sense?
when we traded Wesley... we missed him... but did the trade work for us?
when we traded mccrimmond we missed him... and maybe the trade didn't work
not all trades work... some do... you don't just tell yourself its impossible to trade good looking kid dmen
if LA held onto berg or if carilina held onto pitkanen or if montreal held onto komasarek or if Winnipeg held onto the guy they traded to buffalo... how do those decesions effect those teams fortunes?
Detroit held onto joly for awhile... and Ottawa held onto phillips… did that make a difference?
I could give a list of 50 names of dmen who come into the nhl… end up on the first pair in their rookie season... and basically fade off into the woodwork
and lots of dmen that play on the 3rd pair for a few years and then become studs
how did seth jones do his first couple years... or victor hedman… what were brent burns and dustin byfuglin doing in their first couple years?
im sorry... but knowing how a dman will develop is pretty tricky stuff
im not sure the bruins have an appetite to pay a 21 year old 6 mill a year and cross their fingers
With this logic everyone should trade their 20 year old dmen for 35+ players because history says so. McAvoy should be in zero trade talks. NONE. ZIP. ZEERROOOO....
We traded Seguin for scraps and now he scores on us every game. We have no pieces left from that trade and now have a small window for a cup with no sure thing center ready to go in the system, but a good number of prospects who COULD step in one day.
We trade McAvoy for a run or 2, we then have no #1D in the system ready to go when Chara (and according to your proposal Keith) retires. IF and only IF we have to trade Mc for some reason it's for a #1C of similar age (Point, Dria, Mack, Eichel, etc.)