decent player
^He didn't even score the GWG tonight.
How is it not a GWG if he scored goals number 2 and 3 in a 3-1 win?
This guy is absolutely amazing. If you want to criticize him, I only find the non-existing slapper (slappers are overrated anyway).
Tallon found the hidden gem in the draft. About contract talks: the Finns I know (lived in Mikkeli for one year) are addicted to sun, beaches and warm weather - and he seems to love it in Florida. If the lineup provides a basis to be competitive in the near and mid-term future, I see no reason why he would leave with a fair contract proposal
How long before they'll give Barkov the A, or is it time to just go straight to C?
You don't give the C to a player just because he's your best player. You give the C to a player who has shown to have at very least some leadership skills. Does Barkov look like a leader to you? At least I wouldn't feel comfortable giving the C to an awkward kid...
Yeah. I definitely see him having a future in his teams captaincy. But there is no need to put more pressure on him and simultaneously add more confusion in to the team.
If Barkov is suitable for captain, he will one day be the captain of his team. But we fans tend to put too much weight on it. You can just as easily have a veteran who plays in 3rd line to carry the C. If he is the best option.
In the end, teams will have internal order of leadership. Putting a letter to your jersey doesn't make you a leader and not having a letter doesn't mean you can't be one of the leaders on your team.
He is already a leader. Leading by example on the ice. He isn't vocal guy but this guy is the best example on the ice and off the ice. I doubt he'll get C because he is not vocal but he'll be quiet leader and most likely deserve A on his chest.
C - EkbladEkblad or Gudbranson would be captain of the future more than likely.
C - Ekblad
A - Barkov
A - Bjugstad