berto14
Registered User
- Oct 1, 2009
- 363
- 0
James Mirtle did an interesting bit on his blog (found here: http://mirtle.blogspot.ca/2013/01/2013-nhl-teams-by-weight-height-and-age.html) about each team's height, weight and age ranking according to their opening night rosters. I knew the Flames were a smaller team than we've seen in years past but I didn't realize the situation is quite as bad as it is -- we're currently ranked 30th overall in terms of average weight and 23rd overall in average height.
I hate making trade proposals because the discussion rarely ends well, but who would you like management to target and what do you expect it will cost us to acquire? Is there a trade to be made for one of our surplus d-men?
On another note, the Flames are now 14th overall in terms of average age, coming in just 0.1 years above the league average. Not bad considering we were among the top 3 oldest teams just a couple years ago. So the next time someone tells you that the Flames are one of the oldest teams in the league, you can politely tell them to cram it.
I hate making trade proposals because the discussion rarely ends well, but who would you like management to target and what do you expect it will cost us to acquire? Is there a trade to be made for one of our surplus d-men?
On another note, the Flames are now 14th overall in terms of average age, coming in just 0.1 years above the league average. Not bad considering we were among the top 3 oldest teams just a couple years ago. So the next time someone tells you that the Flames are one of the oldest teams in the league, you can politely tell them to cram it.