Blades of Steel
log off.
Yeah, Im all in on trading Brouwer for whatever and bringing back Ward to fill that role.
Offer him the same contract as Williams.
i said before, if Ward takes a contract identical to Williams, then
Would be elite.
Yeah, Im all in on trading Brouwer for whatever and bringing back Ward to fill that role.
Offer him the same contract as Williams.
RE: Moving Bowey- Would be foolish in any trade. He is Carlson with grit.
GMBM has the advantage of 2 players who are still sitting here waiting to sign. The more they wait the better term we will get them with. I mean Ward and Fehr.
There are also prospects of keeping Ward and/or Fehr beyond next year. Which isn't that clear with Brouwer.
I'd do this swap if I'm GMBM. Trade Brouwer for anything and sign Ward.
Getting Backes would be fantastic but it's a pipedream or will be total overpayment. Trading Brouwer and signing Ward will give us more assets and good position for the deadline.
But... Backes with 4,5M caphit is what we could use for the all in season. If it's without Bura and Kuz, send them Bowey, Vrana, any picks and even LOB! Just I don't believe it, too. Oshie is the more probable target.
I think it's far from true. At the same age Carlson wore an A for his WJC team and scored big time no look overtime goal in the final.
He's already in the bottom of Norris consideration, played in Olympics and is big, tough, durable player.
I do not think Bowey will be close to that.
Also, having Carlson at #1D position is good. Having Carlson-like player at #5 is another story in terms of result influence. We can live without it just as good.
It may be even more beneficial to have designated defensive specialist at that #5 or #6.
I don't think Brouwer is even a regular season top sixer from a possession standpoint whereas Oshie is and could have more success if he gelled with either of their centers or fares better in the East. The upshot for St. Louis would be the one less year on the contract and maybe building a shutdown line. I guess the question is whether that's an objective for them and whether Washington wants to move what could be their shutdown RWer. Does Washington want a shutdown line third line or something more offensive-minded? Of course, for shutdown duty Ward is a superior option.Oshie's a lot like Brouwer (top 6 winger regular season, postseason ghost). Maybe they trade him for futures and then replace him with someone with a good postseason record, but we're not in a position to offer them that directly. And at the end of the day, we don't need another Brouwer. We already have one too many.
I watched Carlson in that WJC. He was good.
I watched Bowey in several recent OHL playoff games. He was VERY good.
In fact I like what I saw from Bowey just as much if not more. If Orpik's play dips, age stands to reason, Bowey will be ready.
Well, maybe Bowey is good. But he is far from being impact defender.
Aging Ovi is the most important factor here.
Backes can help now.
Bowey can't. He's not critical.
Vrana, I agree, could be much more prepared. But Backes is the best center we would have in... I don't know, many years.
Just imagine 3rd line of Burakovsky-Backes and some other guy.
ROR, Lucic, Spezza and Kesler in the past two years. Backes should fetch more than Ribeiro since he's not damaged goods but for St. Louis I doubt they're interested in exclusively futures given what stage they're in. Maybe for Berglund or Oshie but I'd think something involving Backes has to include some immediate help.Who are some forwards who have been traded with 1 year remaining?
Ribeiro went for a 2nd and a prospect. I'm sure I'm missing other more recent ones. I'd assume those returns are the basis for a Backes deal. Which again begs the question, why would St. Louis do it?
Window is closing man.My take
Bowey is going to be a stud top pairing D. Those guys are few and far between.
Caps didn't want to trade a young Carlson for Chris Pronger. They certainly shouldn't trade Bowey for an underwhelming playoff player in Backes.
ROR, Lucic, Spezza and Kesler in the past two years. Backes should fetch more than Ribeiro since he's not damaged goods but for St. Louis I doubt they're interested in exclusively futures given what stage they're in. Maybe for Berglund or Oshie but I'd think something involving Backes has to include some immediate help.
I'd love to expand a STL deal and do something like Johansson+Brouwer+ for Berglund+Oshie. Solves RW and 3C.
Jeremy Rutherford
@jprutherford
Hearing a lot of chatter on the trade front. #stlblues
Window is closing man.
While I'm with you on Bowey...that window is closing. At some point...gotta pull the trigger on something bigger to make the run. Yeah, could get burned like they did with the Erat trade...but that happens far less with these deals during the offseason.
I'd prefer to move Carrick if they are going to move a d man....but Bowey is going to be the commodity to get the bigger player.
Top pairer? I don't see that in Bowey.
Have to disagree with you here.
The best moves are the ones you don't make many times. We traded Forsberg and that indeed was a big mistake. Trading Bowey will be one too.
Also...Backes and Oshie are not going to put us over the top come playoff time. They tend to wilt.
Trading Forsberg was not a mistake. Trading Forsberg for Erat was a mistake.
Conservative teams don't win. See: Washington Capitals 2004-2012.
I'd love to expand a STL deal and do something like Johansson+Brouwer+ for Berglund+Oshie. Solves RW and 3C.
St Louis as a whole is a bad playoff team....I wouldn't put that all square on Oshie or Backes. Chokers? Thats a bit much.So trading Bowey for a playoff choker is a good idea? Thats what we are talking about here.
So...trade 2 vilified players who are playoff "chokers". In return get two playoff chokers making MORE money.
Problem solved??? Do tell how