I don't think we've had an update on his injury yet.
This team, if they can keep playing disciplined hockey, can go deep. They've been really stingy defensively for a good stretch of games now and both goalies are playing very well.
D’ya mind showing your math on deleting Boeser and Beauvillier without taking back salary?
There are things about his call that I like, but he'll go further if he learns to end phrases and sentences on a downward inflection instead of an upward, interrogatory squeak.
There was an update in Canucks Army, saying it was a hand injury, and he was doubtful for the opening series. That suggests it's possible he'll be in at some point in the next round.
problem with moving Boeser is the value we get back. If we give them away for free then somebody will take them for sure considering the FA market sucks and only a handful of teams are thinking about rebuild and most are focused on getting better
I’ve got my dubiousnesses all lined up in a row on this one.
I mean if anything the most recent trade deadlines shows that a lot of what is seen as untradeable contracts are quite tradeable.
Just out of curiosity, how do you rank the Bermuda Triangle cap vanisher trio of wingers? Like given your preference, who stays and goes and what you’d try to do.
Garland might be the easiest to move, rumor had it we were offered a 2nd for him last off-season.
Oh, that’s apparently Beauvillier’s nickname. I got lazy. Maybe that name stayed back on Long Island. One point I wanna clarify is my names order there wasn’t a ranking. I just thought of their names in that order.
I mean there were interest in Brock but teams wanted Canucks to take money back and we want additional asset to take cap.
I mean try to have him work out here. He’s been laying it on hard through the media to stay.
Well if we want to sell him, best that everyone act like he is going to be here.
