Leblanc played for five different teams, under five different coaches, in five different leagues within five seasons. He should had stayed at Harvard instead of jumping in the Q. He regrets that now.
I never said he wasn't pretty good, I said he wasn't very good. His stats never projected him to be a sure-fire top 6 player. You're not really responding to what I wrote. I'll say it again - Louis Leblanc was never very good at any level since he left Midget AAA - in MAAA he was one of the best players in the league - he was never even close to that in the Q or in the AHL - I never saw him play in USHL or Harvard but his stats don't show him as being a phenomenal player in either league.McCarron - NHL - 69-2-6-8
Leblanc - NHL - 50-5-5-10
That's not true. How did he get named Rookie of the year at 17 and in the Ivy league at 18? Wouldn't logic say you would have to be at least pretty good to be the top rookie in the league or conference (though the Ivy league isn't it's own conference)
Spoke like someone that doesn't know what they are talking about. I'll never understand this, I've been at HF for a long time and it's always been this way, while people that don't know what they are talking about feel they need to have such a strong opinion.
How many games did you see him at Havard, or in the USHL? Also it's not the points you should be looking at it's the context. Havard was terrible that year they won 9 games all season, Leblanc led the team in goals with 11 as an 18 year old while playing in a league were the average age is over 21. They were a very young team, only Leblanc and 2 other players had more then 7 goals on the season.
Also how many 18 year olds do you see leading their team in scoring in the NCAA?
It was talked about a lot at the time, how unusual his development path was and how you really don't want to see a player play for so many different teams over several years and what impact it may of had on his development. It's a shame that he didn't just stay at Havard, might not have made the least bit difference but it would have been less pressure and he likely wouldn't have been rushed to the NHL at 20 since he would hopefully of still been at Havard.
I never said he wasn't pretty good, I said he wasn't very good. His stats never projected him to be a sure-fire top 6 player. You're not really responding to what I wrote. I'll say it again - Louis Leblanc was never very good at any level since he left Midget AAA - in MAAA he was one of the best players in the league - he was never even close to that in the Q or in the AHL - I never saw him play in USHL or Harvard but his stats don't show him as being a phenomenal player in either league.
You seem to be saying he was pretty good, and I agree with that, but he was never ripping up a league like guys like Jakub Voracek or Claude Giroux, or Jonathan Drouin did.
So why do you say I don't know what I'm talking about? I mean I saw Leblanc play live in junior. He wasn't even really as good as Angelo Esposito, although you could argue either way on that one. I think it would be more accurate to say he was on a par with Angelo Esposito.
Ah I see what you are saying... Ok he lacked drive to become a pro hockey player. And we all know that because he quit at age 25.
And by the way, talking condescendingly to me on a message board is pretty much prick move. Why don't you stick to your point rather than insulting and denigrating people you don't know.
Whatever the guy never got 30 points in the AHL season who cares. He can't even hack it in the AHL and supposed to believe he had some NHL future. This guy wasn't even as good as Agostino, Ghetto, or Hudon in the AHL and these 3 guys are barely NHLers. 97 points in 234 AHL games. Would you be excited for a player with that state line who isn't a grinding fighter?
I never said he wasn't pretty good, I said he wasn't very good. His stats never projected him to be a sure-fire top 6 player. You're not really responding to what I wrote. I'll say it again - Louis Leblanc was never very good at any level since he left Midget AAA - in MAAA he was one of the best players in the league - he was never even close to that in the Q or in the AHL - I never saw him play in USHL or Harvard but his stats don't show him as being a phenomenal player in either league.
You seem to be saying he was pretty good, and I agree with that, but he was never ripping up a league like guys like Jakub Voracek or Claude Giroux, or Jonathan Drouin did.
So why do you say I don't know what I'm talking about? I mean I saw Leblanc play live in junior. He wasn't even really as good as Angelo Esposito, although you could argue either way on that one. I think it would be more accurate to say he was on a par with Angelo Esposito.
So what all of a sudden prospects are measured against the Harvard NCAA team? Come on. Danny Biega led the team the year after as a young defenceman and he had 30 points and he never became an NHLer either.In Junior with Montreal, he had the best ppg, and had 100 minutes of penalty. He was very involved. The year before he had the most points in Harvard. And had the most points the year before for his ushl team....
So why did Leblanc never get 30 pts in the AHL? Because he was called up to the NHL. They should never have rushed him to the NHL, he was on pace for 54 pts in the AHL at 20. That's better then Getto did at the same age, Agostino since he wasn't even in the AHL at 20, and only 3 pts behind Hudon's rookie year.
Leblanc was one of our best players in Hamilton in his rookie year, if he wasn't he wouldn't have been called up to the NHL.
So what all of a sudden prospects are measured against the Harvard NCAA team? Come on. Danny Biega led the team the year after as a young defenceman and he had 30 points and he never became an NHLer either.
Jimmy Vesey put up years of 58 points and 46 points for Harvard. That's dominating a league, and Vesey is an NHLer now. Leblanc never put up those numbers.
Now if people want to argue "maybe he could have if..." well that becomes speculation and it's pointless or rather destined to be inconclusive because it's outside of reality. If you want to say "Leblanc looked OK at the time and I thought at the time he would turn into something than he did." I would agree - I thought so too.
But what I'm saying is he never did very well in any league after Midget AAA. He never dominated any league after Midget AAA. Maybe the USHL - I mean I really don't follow that league, but it doesn't look like it by the stat sheet. But after the Habs drafted him, he never put up the kind of points that said "this guy is definitely going to be an NHLer." Which is not to say he wasn't good, and I thought he would work out in some capacity, but that lack of top end skill combined with the fact that for whatever reason he wasn't happy playing a lesser role, meant that he quit hockey by age 25.
And after that? After his rookie year he played 8 NHL games. He played 203 more AHL games but never cracked 30 points in the league. He got 75 points. But yes lets give the 30 game sample size all the weight and ignore the other 200 games. I guess I should say DD was the best habs C since he had one 60 point season that one year and then MT came and ruined him LOL.
This is a what have you done for me lately league. If Domi didn't explode this year he would still be the joke player with 4 goals on a goalie.
Leblanc couldn't produce in the AHL. If it makes everyone feel better to blame Sly then blame Sly. I will even say the guy wasn't a good coach and probably not a good fit for Leblanc, but another coach is going to turn him from 75 points in 203 games to 150 points in 203 games, ya I doubt it.
I bet the injury was more serious then he let on and it really hurt his game and he couldn't play the same way he could in JR and that first season and his career took a nose dive. Also he never bulked up. Its okay to not hit the gym against kids, but against pros and adults you can't do that. He didn't need to be Mister Universe but at least get tree trunk legs and build your core.
There are warning signs for every prospect drafted out of a top 5 pick. Heck, some top 3 still have warning signs.
That ain't an argument.
No, there is nothing amusing about it and yes it happens. If you think LL and Tinordi are guys who were absolutely not damanged by their development at all, then name me a player who you think saw his career go down the drain because of how he was terribly handled as a prospect?
Leblanc was producing well in his 1st season at AHL level under Clément Jodoin. His second run under Sly turned sour.
Beaulieu? The guy is an NHL defenseman. What is Erik Karlsson all of a sudden the standard for top-20 picks?
Whatever the guy never got 30 points in the AHL season who cares. He can't even hack it in the AHL and supposed to believe he had some NHL future. This guy wasn't even as good as Agostino, Ghetto, or Hudon in the AHL and these 3 guys are barely NHLers. 97 points in 234 AHL games. Would you be excited for a player with that state line who isn't a grinding fighter?
Yes he had a decnet 30 games. What about the rest of his AHL tenure? Why is his first 30 games given so much more weight then the rest of his career?
Anyways to much arguing over a guy who sucked in the AHL. Lets just continue on with the victim mentality and blame it all on Sly, the player had no agency or control. Once he meet Sly all that talent boom vanished and gone.
Sly was a bad coach, but Louis was a bad professional hockey player, match made in heaven.
lol... weren't you doing exactly that by questioning Louis Leblanc's character, without knowing him?
So lemme get this straight, you find it insulting that I called you a pro-management type, when your posting history (I pay attention) is squarely that. Dude, who are you trying to kid here?
We all have bias btw. Myself included. It's part of our nature. Oh boo-hoo, I said you had bias, and I actually took the time and brought arguments that kinda give weight to what I'm saying....
Anyway, sorry if you were offended, but I hope that you'll forget about what was the least important part of my response to you, and what you might take out of it instead is understanding that what drives our ambitions and passions can't really be judged outright as you did, because all you had to work on is lack of confidence (omg, never even a young elite player has dealt with that, right?) and that somehow he went from hopeful to bust.
It was talked about a lot at the time, how unusual his development path was and how you really don't want to see a player play for so many different teams over several years and what impact it may of had on his development. It's a shame that he didn't just stay at Havard, might not have made the least bit difference but it would have been less pressure and he likely wouldn't have been rushed to the NHL at 20 since he would hopefully of still been at Havard.
I'm truly impressed how Leblanc's self-serving droppings have garnered 15 pages worth of discussion.
I kind of wish he went more into what parts of busting were his responsibility. What I took from his text is he sees himself as someone who was "so promising", a hard worker, who sees himself as an NHL GM one day who had some tough times because of circumstances outside of his control. Ok...
Whats interesting though is he changed teams in Europe three times within a year. What happened there ? Hes had an atypical path even for a first round bust.
After having tasted the NHL (too early), I am guessing many young players are falling in the same trap than Leblanc. If he would have had a coach like Bouchard, I think he could had been motivated to work his ass off at AHL level and get better prepared for NHL.
I'm truly impressed how Leblanc's self-serving droppings have garnered 15 pages worth of discussion.
So what all of a sudden prospects are measured against the Harvard NCAA team? Come on. Danny Biega led the team the year after as a young defenceman and he had 30 points and he never became an NHLer either.
Jimmy Vesey put up years of 58 points and 46 points for Harvard. That's dominating a league, and Vesey is an NHLer now. Leblanc never put up those numbers.
Now if people want to argue "maybe he could have if..." well that becomes speculation and it's pointless or rather destined to be inconclusive because it's outside of reality. If you want to say "Leblanc looked OK at the time and I thought at the time he would turn into something than he did." I would agree - I thought so too.
But what I'm saying is he never did very well in any league after Midget AAA. He never dominated any league after Midget AAA. Maybe the USHL - I mean I really don't follow that league, but it doesn't look like it by the stat sheet. But after the Habs drafted him, he never put up the kind of points that said "this guy is definitely going to be an NHLer." Which is not to say he wasn't good, and I thought he would work out in some capacity, but that lack of top end skill combined with the fact that for whatever reason he wasn't happy playing a lesser role, meant that he quit hockey by age 25.
And after that? After his rookie year he played 8 NHL games. He played 203 more AHL games but never cracked 30 points in the league. He got 75 points. But yes lets give the 30 game sample size all the weight and ignore the other 200 games. I guess I should say DD was the best habs C since he had one 60 point season that one year and then MT came and ruined him LOL.
This is a what have you done for me lately league. If Domi didn't explode this year he would still be the joke player with 4 goals on a goalie.
Leblanc couldn't produce in the AHL. If it makes everyone feel better to blame Sly then blame Sly. I will even say the guy wasn't a good coach and probably not a good fit for Leblanc, but another coach is going to turn him from 75 points in 203 games to 150 points in 203 games, ya I doubt it.
I bet the injury was more serious then he let on and it really hurt his game and he couldn't play the same way he could in JR and that first season and his career took a nose dive. Also he never bulked up. Its okay to not hit the gym against kids, but against pros and adults you can't do that. He didn't need to be Mister Universe but at least get tree trunk legs and build your core.
If he was good enough Harvard or not he would have made it.