TCTC
Registered User
- Mar 25, 2013
- 13,091
- 9,574
In the end he'll force his way up the ladder no matter what. A few games on the 4th line won't change that.TK was producing..then got demoted to the Twin Line and lost his groove again.
In the end he'll force his way up the ladder no matter what. A few games on the 4th line won't change that.TK was producing..then got demoted to the Twin Line and lost his groove again.
Which player on our team has been ruined? We might not agree with some of their usage, but they all seem to be fine. Ghost is playing well again despite his not so good start. Provy is already a #1 and TK is still producing.
This "they will all be ruined by our coaching staff"-talk is a bit much IMO.
In the end he'll force his way up the ladder no matter what. A few games on the 4th line won't change that.
I want to wait and see what his useage looks like when we have a really talented defense. When Hakstol doesn't feel the need to rely on veterans because of lack of talent on the backend.If you meant me, it was to the Hart posted a few up. Sorry about that.
TK's usage as of late is pretty awful. His PP is gone now and even Weal put up over a minute more TOI than he did.
The overall handling of Ghost has been awful. With the scratches while he was playing well and then playing players that are clearly failing at every turn over Ghost (benching him, and like tonight with Manning) is ****ing awful. Hak needs to go. So do a ton of other players.
Ghost up to 38 points. He could hit 40 still despite 5 healthy scratches and zero faith from his coach.
Gudas was sorely missed tonight.
It's not even about being ruined, playing a guy like Manning over Ghost tonight was a big reason why they went down 4-1. At the end of the second, Manning had nearly double the even strength time that Ghost did. That imbalance kept up until they went down 4-1.Which player on our team has been ruined? We might not agree with some of their usage, but they all seem to be fine. Ghost is playing well again despite his not so good start. Provy is already a #1 and TK is still producing.
This "they will all be ruined by our coaching staff"-talk is a bit much IMO.
I've been at a Wrestlemania party, so I didn't watch the Flyers game. I did watch the replays of the goals, however. Manning clearly blew the coverage on the first one. On the second, you could see his stick being held. Simmons should have back checked better and picked up the player heading to the net. Manning was with Kreider on the third. He just got a lucky deflection.
Maybe not his best overall game, but hopefully he will still be in the top 7 next year. He's earned it the good old hard fashioned way.
I've been at a Wrestlemania party, so I didn't watch the Flyers game. I did watch the replays of the goals, however. Manning clearly blew the coverage on the first one. On the second, you could see his stick being held. Simmons should have back checked better and picked up the player heading to the net. Manning was with Kreider on the third. He just got a lucky deflection.
Maybe not his best overall game, but hopefully he will still be in the top 7 next year. He's earned it the good old hard fashioned way.
I'm still not a fan of Weise. I'd like to see someone else, maybe even Weal get a shot at playing with Couturier and Schenn.
Yeah, either Raffl or Lindblom would be optimal on that line. I know it won't happen, but I'd just like to see Weal on that line for the rest of the year to see what he can really do. He's obviously been very productive with Filpulla, but a chance to play with a guy like Couturier might really show if he can be a top 6 guy. Most of Weal's goals have been rebounds or broken plays, it hasn't seemed like he gets a lot of help from his linemates. On the other hand, the play usually dies once it touches Weise's stick.Lindblom or Raffl would be best, I think. Keeps a heavy 2-way line, and Schenn still needs to be balanced out a bit defensively and possession wise.
Weise is having a hot stretch and doing OK but it's still obvious he's more a hanger-on who is just driving the net and getting some good puck luck (hey, that's fine, he wasn't doing that earlier). But he's not really creating anything either. It depends on what the Giroux line looks like, but either of those two would be better than Weise, in that order probably. Lindblom, if he's not on the Giroux line and Konceny is instead, would look amazing at that LW.
Meltzer is tearing Milbury to shreds on twitter.
And that's what I am most disappointed in. I thought Hak would come in and be great for wanting to use kids and develop them. Instead, he loves his seniors.
I know people will say, "But Provorov!"
But Provorov was as mature and safe and reliable (notice the Hakstokian buzz words) as it gets as a teenager/prospect. He basically needed little to no break-in to hit his stride and start conquering the league. It will not likely be that easy for the others -- it just won't, unfortunately. Guys will make mistakes, struggle, be inconsistent, need to adjust, may not really find their games until they are 2-3 seasons in the bigs and may play very much like their ages. What then?
We're heading towards a point where there won't really be many vets on this team, especially on the back end, and he won't have his blankets on skates to snuggle up to when they do struggle. But next year, if Sanheim+Morin are here, along with Provorov and Ghost, I fully expect MacDonald to be top pair Andy again. And for the foreseeable future, as long as he's here. Honestly, I can't even say for certain Manning won't be the #6.