GDT: #79 | Bruins 3 at FLYERS 4 (OT) | Sun., Apr. 1, 2018, 12:30 pm ET | NBC, TVAS

Ghosts Beer

I saw Goody Fletcher with the Devil!
Feb 10, 2014
22,619
16,426
I remember Roger Neilson talking once about how he was a longtime baseball coach and manager in addition to coaching hockey. He said that baseball was much easier from a motivational standpoint because it was largely an individual sport and didn't require the same type of energy. Whereas, with hockey he said, "You hope your players show up."

I didn't particularly like the quote at the time, because I thought it undersold the responsibility of a coach to fire up a team. But he did have a point in that you can use every motivational trick in the book, but you can't be fully responsible 100% of the time for whether an individual plays hard. Maybe occasionally you can fire them up, but if you have to do it all the time the message loses effectiveness and players need to be largely responsible for their own effort and only occasionally need a kick in the pants. (And no, I'm not saying Hakstol is blameless for their often slow starts. He could be largely to blame for many of them. I don't know what goes on in the locker room.)
 
  • Like
Reactions: marcsson68

deadhead

Registered User
Feb 26, 2014
49,215
21,617
I'm skeptical of a coach's ability to motivate a team over a longer run, I remember Ray "they're gonna rape your wife and mother" Rhodes.
In sports like hockey and basketball, teams are going to have off nights, it's hard with travel and the long season to get up for every game.
But teams that tend to consistently play at a high level have motivated self-starters who can fire up their teammates, mostly by example.
I think Giroux for example, is one of those guys, Lindblom never seems to take a shift off, etc.

And it's hard to play at a high level of intensity for 3 periods (or 4 quarters) which is why "flow" games often go back and forth, we've seen the Flyers come out slow then dominate for a period and a half. On the road, the home team often is fired up to begin games, but if you can withstand that assault, often go flat as the adrenalin wears off.

One reason rivalry games were so much fun was players had the adrenalin going all game when the teams hated each other.
But these days with the diluted schedules, it's hard to think of a team that the players consider their nemesis.
Whereas in the NFL, the Eagles feed off their fans' hatred of the Cowboys.
 

Cody Webster

Registered User
Jul 18, 2014
25,233
23,356
Correct. 2014 in the playoffs.
They played the Penguins in 2015 on Easter as well iirc

And perhaps the Bruins in 2013?

Was the Capitals in 2013. The Bruins were the day before. Remember having an early Easter watching the Bruins game
 
Last edited:

baudib1

Registered User
Apr 12, 2016
8,136
11,633
Las Vegas
I don't know what the reason for the slow starts is. It could be that Hakstol does a poor job in choosing early matchups, or that the coaching staff as a whole does a poor job in preparing the team on how to attack/defend certain teams. I'm not a huge fan of blaming the coach for not motivating teams, especially a team with a strong veteran core like the Flyers with very self-motivated players like Giroux, Provy, Simmonds, etc.

I tend to think in general that analyzing a coach's in-game decisions is overrated. Certainly there are hundreds of micro decisions made each game and if one guy is 2% better on them, that will result in better outcomes over the course of a season. There are also extreme examples of tangible spots where the coach actively costs his team 2 points, like the Nashville game early on.

That said, these parts of the game certainly aren't a strength for Hakstol. And he is really bad at personnel/deployment aspects of the job.
 

marcsson68

Registered User
Jan 23, 2018
447
585
One point Panthers, one point Devils, two points Columbus.
.
Not much has changed but my feeling is Florida is running out of gas. Bruins with quite a workload. Expect the usual slow start and another OT.
 
  • Like
Reactions: FlyerFaithful17

Alex91

Registered User
Sep 12, 2014
2,474
741
Hoping Boston kicks Florida ass Sat and rest some of their vets Sunday and we pick up a huge 4pts
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rebels57

Curufinwe

Registered User
Feb 28, 2013
55,756
42,790
Boston will need to keep winning till they are guaranteed the top seed in the Atlantic.

The current NHL playoff system means either the 2nd or 3rd/4th best Eastern team will be eliminated after the first round. Which is terrible. The 1998 system of 1-8 with the division winners being the top two seeds was so much better.

1 Bos v 8 NJ
2 Was v 7 Phi
3 TB v 6 CBJ
4 Tor v 5 Pit

1 Nas v 8 Ana
2 VGK v 7 LA
3 Win v 6 StL
4 SJ v 5 Min
 

PHILOUDELPHIA

Registered User
Feb 29, 2012
9,253
7,350
South Jersey NJ
FLA has 6 games left 3 against bruins 1 vs NSH 1 vs CAR 1 vs BUF

Flyers magic number in terms of points is 7 which can be lowered by FLA not getting 2 pts in each of their remaining games or flyers by getting 1 or 2 pts each in 4 left games.

By time our game vs B's is over best case flyers magic number in terms of points will be 3
 

PHILOUDELPHIA

Registered User
Feb 29, 2012
9,253
7,350
South Jersey NJ
Also just noticed this

In addition to those having Comcast or Fios which should have Free NHL Center ice with MLB extra innings being free thru April 5. So Most of us can watch B's beat FLA Sat 1pm.

I noticed NHL.tv will also have that game as the Free game of the day. So for those on Directv you can watch as well.
 

tucson83

Registered User
Sep 30, 2017
2,638
1,234
I don't know what the reason for the slow starts is. It could be that Hakstol does a poor job in choosing early matchups, or that the coaching staff as a whole does a poor job in preparing the team on how to attack/defend certain teams. I'm not a huge fan of blaming the coach for not motivating teams, especially a team with a strong veteran core like the Flyers with very self-motivated players like Giroux, Provy, Simmonds, etc.

I tend to think in general that analyzing a coach's in-game decisions is overrated. Certainly there are hundreds of micro decisions made each game and if one guy is 2% better on them, that will result in better outcomes over the course of a season. There are also extreme examples of tangible spots where the coach actively costs his team 2 points, like the Nashville game early on.

That said, these parts of the game certainly aren't a strength for Hakstol. And he is really bad at personnel/deployment aspects of the job.

it's because hakstol doesnt adapt, he doesnt put players in the best postion, he's always playing favorites over what's working, that causes inconsistency, you see it on the players, hakstol has no direction, no plan. he just does what he wants. that's not good coaching. it's the same way with phillies game yesterday, i mean the manager has no clue on what he's doing, that's why you need vet coaching.
 
Last edited:

JXC

#ThisAintXbox #ThisAintMightyDucks #FireHakstol
Dec 28, 2005
21,926
4,898
But teams that tend to consistently play at a high level have motivated self-starters who can fire up their teammates, mostly by example.

But he did have a point in that you can use every motivational trick in the book, but you can't be fully responsible 100% of the time for whether an individual plays hard. Maybe occasionally you can fire them up, but if you have to do it all the time the message loses effectiveness and players need to be largely responsible for their own effort and only occasionally need a kick in the pants.

You’re both wrong; it can be done!

giphy.gif
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ghosts Beer

JXC

#ThisAintXbox #ThisAintMightyDucks #FireHakstol
Dec 28, 2005
21,926
4,898
But seriously, like everything in sports, the simple answer doesn’t exist, because sports are played by humans, and human behavior defies simplistic analysis.

Hakstol and the players all know they have a problem, and all have probably taken [somewhat futile] steps to correct it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ghosts Beer

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad