Post-Game Talk: #59 | Flyers at Oilers | February 21, 2023

LegionOfDoom91

Registered User
Jan 25, 2013
82,055
140,030
Philadelphia, PA
D776DFFD-C3B3-4258-9B20-E60CAE8EF9CC.jpeg


Strong effort indeed.
 

deadhead

Registered User
Feb 26, 2014
49,215
21,617
They hung in there for two periods, then a back to back on the road with TK out had the expected effect on their legs in the 3rd period.

Were you expecting something different?
 

Beef Invictus

Revolutionary Positivity
Dec 21, 2009
128,086
165,999
Armored Train
They hung in there for two periods, then a back to back on the road with TK out had the expected effect on their legs in the 3rd period.

Were you expecting something different?

You told us Tortorella would provide something different, yes.

Nobody here is surprised this team lost. The way you sold things though, you should be. Especially against a team you claim is so very soft, despite them tossing the Flyers around
 

wasup

Registered User
Mar 21, 2018
2,471
2,315
They hung in there for two periods, then a back to back on the road with TK out had the expected effect on their legs in the 3rd period.

Were you expecting something different?
They hung in there great limiting the great McDavid and company to 12 shots on goal 47 mins into the game . Lycksell took a stupid 4 min deserved penalty and the momentum changed . McDavid,s goals were flicking the puck down the ice and an attempted pass that banked of Sandheim and went into the goal . Cates Allison and Laughton were matched up head to head most of the time and Cates and Allison ended up plus 1 on the night .

People on here thinking Edmonton are so great have shit for brains . 5vs 5 play they are crap their only thing they have is a powerplay and they have to rely on getting pp time to try to win a game . Stay out of the box and they are hooped . If Edmonton played in the east they are a bubble playoff team .
 

LegionOfDoom91

Registered User
Jan 25, 2013
82,055
140,030
Philadelphia, PA
They hung in there great limiting the great McDavid and company to 12 shots on goal 47 mins into the game . Lycksell took a stupid 4 min deserved penalty and the momentum changed . McDavid,s goals were flicking the puck down the ice and an attempted pass that banked of Sandheim and went into the goal . Cates Allison and Laughton were matched up head to head most of the time and Cates and Allison ended up plus 1 on the night .

People on here thinking Edmonton are so great have shit for brains . 5vs 5 play they are crap their only thing they have is a powerplay and they have to rely on getting pp time to try to win a game . Stay out of the box and they are hooped . If Edmonton played in the east they are a bubble playoff team .

Does anybody really think Edmonton is good though? They’re pretty much an average team carried by two star players one of them a generational talent. That’s been their MO for a while now.
 

deadhead

Registered User
Feb 26, 2014
49,215
21,617
Being 25th in a 32 team league despite getting mostly great goaltending shows what kind of coach Torts is in 2023.
Uh, no.
Hart has been above average overall, but with some spotty stretches.
Ersson has been great for 7 starts, but Sandstrom has been well below average for 10 starts.
So overall the goaltending has been slightly above average, but not close to "great."

What we've seen is a team that lacks talent, playing hard, being competitive, but losing because they're just not good enough.

Funny how Berube and Hakstol look so much better when they coach teams with more talent - people overestimated the talent on this team for the past decade (myself included), but in retrospect, if you look at the bottom six forwards and the defense, this team has always been very thin with little quality depth.

What hide the truth was a few top players in their peak years that got to the playoffs when they had good goaltending, and didn't when the goaltenders went south. When those players got old (Giroux, Jake, Simmonds) the downward spiral began.

This took a decade, from Holmgren after the Carter/Richards trades, Hextall failing to get premier talent out of a flawed rebuild. The extensions to Ghost, Jake, the signing of JVR all happened before Fletcher, he's responsible for Ellis, Hayes and Risto (TDA is 2 years, so no real issue). Couts was a no-brainer, hometown discount by their best player. Atkinson is Voracek (same money). Sanheim - people were clamoring to extend him and most considered $6M to be a bargain.

The core problem has always been a lack of vision by the FO - until they embrace the reality of rebuilding, this team will continue to spin its wheels with any GM dumb enough to take the job.
 

FlyerNutter

In the forest, a man learns what it means to live
Jun 22, 2018
12,478
28,482
Winnipeg
I've successfully managed to pull back from watching for the last few months. Snippets of games, to more - and more nil.

It's not really even the losses, or obvs improper team building FO philosophy - they are just boring AF.

From a taste of Lindros, to Forsberg, Kimmo, Briere, Pronger, Richards, Carter, and Giroux. It's just a product that is hard to put time in. This overwhelming fixation on winning with effort, and vanilla depth doesn't do it. Loyalty does indeed have limits.
 

FlyerNutter

In the forest, a man learns what it means to live
Jun 22, 2018
12,478
28,482
Winnipeg
Hart is 9th among goalies with 1200 minutes (20 games played minimum) in HDSV%.

Ersson is 1st when you reduce it to 300 minutes (5 games played minimum).

Imagine handwaving that off. That performance produces a ton of stolen games.

This is peak Anaheim hanging on to prime Gibson when it's clear they are going to be doing shit for a very long time.

Hart's next contract will be something to laugh at.
 

Beef Invictus

Revolutionary Positivity
Dec 21, 2009
128,086
165,999
Armored Train
This is peak Anaheim hanging on to prime Gibson when it's clear they are going to be doing shit for a very long time.

Hart's next contract will be something to laugh at.

Correct.

Also correct on how crushingly boring this team has become because of the moronic hockey philosophies espoused by the corrupt and rotting Clarke Management Tree.

Their most interesting players are almost entirely guys who are middle of the lineup players anywhere else. Pathetic. They loathe skill, and skill is what makes for fun.
 

BernieParent

In misery of redwings of suckage for a long time
Mar 13, 2009
24,678
44,312
Chasm of Sar (north of Montreal, Qc)
I've successfully managed to pull back from watching for the last few months. Snippets of games, to more - and more nil.

It's not really even the losses, or obvs improper team building FO philosophy - they are just boring AF.

From a taste of Lindros, to Forsberg, Kimmo, Briere, Pronger, Richards, Carter, and Giroux. It's just a product that is hard to put time in. This overwhelming fixation on winning with effort, and vanilla depth doesn't do it. Loyalty does indeed have limits.
There was a lot of cap-tipping from the Oilers PBP guys throughout the game that the Flyers were doing exactly what they had to do -- grinding the game to a standstill -- to have a chance at winning because they were so far behind in the skill department.
 
  • Wow
Reactions: Beef Invictus

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad