Teufelsdreck
Registered User
- Sep 17, 2005
- 17,709
- 170
Sick goal from Ikonen! came down the wing and made a nice move, buried a wrister from the slot. 4-2 Fins in the 3rd.
Can we watch the highlights somewhere after the game ??
The goal is at about 2:36:30.Don't know about highlights but the full game can be watched on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bl0S5IAkUlc
Don't know about highlights but the full game can be watched on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bl0S5IAkUlc
He showed good speed/skating, is a little undersized though. It was my first time seeing him in a full game and not camp highlights or youtube vids. Was impressed although the Czech's weren't that impressive, if not for some saveable goals by the Finnish goalie. (although I was working so didn't get to see everything). Interesting that as an 18 year old he was wearing an A.
Don't know about highlights but the full game can be watched on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bl0S5IAkUlc
Wow, Ikonen looks tiny. He looks 5'9, maybe 5'10. Whatever they're listing him at is a farce.
Wow, Ikonen looks tiny. He looks 5'9, maybe 5'10. Whatever they're listing him at is a farce.
It's not a farce. He was measured at the last NHL combine.
Joni Ikonen: 5-foot-11, 176.76 pounds
http://thehockeywriters.com/2017-nhl-combine-heights-weights/
*
he does look small out there.
I always knew he was small, but that video clip makes him look like a bantam player. Not going to expect him to suddenly grow another couple inches and gain 30lbs, but he really needs to fill out and get stronger. Still at least 3 years away, so I won't bag on this fact much.
He seems to have good vision and great speed once he gets going. Would like to see a better first couple steps from him, but again, he's at least a few years away from the NHL.
Yeah, I think it was his size that made him fall in the draft. It is a bit concerning as, although there are a lot of effective small players these days, it's still harder to make. And, we already have a lot of small players. But as long as he's talented and can put up points, he will be sorely needed for our anemic offense and there should be a spot for him. We gave up on Ghetto because of his size too early.
Yeah, I think it was his size that made him fall in the draft. It is a bit concerning as, although there are a lot of effective small players these days, it's still harder to make. And, we already have a lot of small players. But as long as he's talented and can put up points, he will be sorely needed for our anemic offense and there should be a spot for him. We gave up on Ghetto because of his size too early.
No we gave up ghetto because he was always overrated, he was suppose to have speed but was always behind the play, had poor puck control and was a south to north player wich we have a ton.
Time will tell what he becomes. The thing is, the fact is he hasn't finished developing. No way a team as bad as our offensively should have given up on Ghetto for a player like Martinsen. Martinsen, Ott, and King were not helpful. That's why Ott and King aren't back. And Martinsen who was signed for the minimum, could have been obtained on the open market. I would have rather had DSP, who signed in Washington for the same contract Martinsen got.
But we'll see what becomes of Ghetto. Was his end of season in Colorado a fluke?
We'll see.
Andrighetto, like DSP the year before, just exploded offensively on a bottom feeder team with no Playoffs aspirations and pressure. Playing with McKinnon helped Ghetto a lot.