8-3-1 since the road trip from hell, including 1-0 loss to TB, including two wins over Caps, Bruins, @ St Louis, and Pens.
During that stretch: CF/xGF; CFrel/xGFrel
Raffl 54.11/42.79; +1.60/-11.90
Laughton 47.22/43.23; -7.66/-11.35
Pitlick 42.71/40.58; -12.79/-14.26
NAK 50.00/53.55; -3.61/+1.92
Farabee 50.00/52.14; -2.06/+1.93
Bunnaman 48.84/54.61; -6.30/+1.67
PK - xGA/60
Laughton 4.68
Pitlick 4.30
8-3-1 since the road trip from hell, including 1-0 loss to TB, including two wins over Caps, Bruins, @ St Louis, and Pens.
During that stretch: CF/xGF; CFrel/xGFrel
Raffl 54.11/42.79; +1.60/-11.90
Laughton 47.22/43.23; -7.66/-11.35
Pitlick 42.71/40.58; -12.79/-14.26
NAK 50.00/53.55; -3.61/+1.92
Farabee 50.00/52.14; -2.06/+1.93
Bunnaman 48.84/54.61; -6.30/+1.67
PK - xGA/60
Laughton 4.68
Pitlick 4.30
Big deal. A couple percentage points in CF% & xGF% over the last 12 games doesn’t mean Bunnaman has been more important to the team than Pitlick, Laughton, & Raffl over that span.
Bunnaman averaged 8:52/game, least on the team in that stretch. (Laughton 15:06, Raffl 13:34, Pitlick 12:31.)
Played 10/12 games.
34% on draws. 1 G, 1 A, 7 SOG. 0 PK time. 0 PP time.
Laughton: 4 goals, 20 SOG, 28:39 PK time.
Raffl: 2 G, 2 A, 13 shots, 16:40 PK time. 11/12 games.
Pitlick: 1 G, 4 A, 11 SOG, 18:18 PK time.
All 3 have played more minutes & more difficult minutes than Bunnaman & made bigger contributions.
The obsession with Corsi & xGF as player rating systems is off-base.