- Aug 19, 2005
- 16,139
- 4,690
The booing honestly wasn't that bad either. It was one time for 10-15 seconds. Not exactly the end of the world.
Not exactly undeserved, either.
The booing honestly wasn't that bad either. It was one time for 10-15 seconds. Not exactly the end of the world.
A Bogo - shattenkirk 2nd pairing would take a lot of pressure off Risto
So it's impossible to add D and keep Kane?
Yep. Impossible.
You tell me who the trade bait is. I'm also open to moving Reinhart and Nylander, but you gotta give to get.
Reinhart is a no-go for me.
Foligno
Girgensons
Nylander
Bailey
Baptiste
Fasching
Pu
Asplund
1st round 2017
Lots of ammo there.
My point is that there is more than Kane available that can get a deal done.
It seems that the majority sees Kane for D man as the only move.
Reinhart is a no-go for me.
Foligno
Girgensons
Nylander
Bailey
Baptiste
Fasching
Pu
Asplund
1st round 2017
Lots of ammo there.
My point is that there is more than Kane available that can get a deal done.
It seems that the majority sees Kane for D man as the only move.
Reinhart is a no-go for me.
Foligno
Girgensons
Nylander
Bailey
Baptiste
Fasching
Pu
Asplund
1st round 2017
Lots of ammo there.
My point is that there is more than Kane available that can get a deal done.
It seems that the majority sees Kane for D man as the only move.
But what started this discussion is that Kane's value is peaking right now. There's plenty of guys who can be moved, none of them have the value of Kane as a rental to a contender. Not even Kane would have that much value if he had a couple more years on his deal. the fact that he's playing good hockey, and that if he's a headache his contract is almost up just adds to his value right now imo.
I love how people act as if Buffalo needs another elite d-man. The Sabres need 2 quality- to above average starters going forward. It's not as if you have to sell the farm to get a couple quality starters. Yes, they are not cheap, but Buffalo doesn't have to trade Reinhart to get a quality dman.
I understand why Kane is a staple for a trade: He's youngish, hes a UFA after next year, and is currently hot, coupled with the fact that our best prospects are wingers.
Kane does not have as much trade value as some think: while he is still young he is reaching the peak of his career and will command a good contract. When Buffalo acquired Kane he had 3.5 (3) years left at a decent rate. He would have 1 year left and then command probably in the $5-6.5m range for 5-7 years.
Kane is not a rental since he has another year + he needs to be protected. Kane on a fair contract for 3 years was one of the reasons why acquiring him was so pricey.
Buffalo bought high on Kane and we want to sell him high? Murray had a long term plan with Kane in the picture.
I stopped watching during the 2nd because I'm bad luck but did anyone comment about his body language after the 2nd goal? Hey gave O'Reilly a "Yeah, whatever" shrug when Ryan pointed to him.
I thought that was weird AF too... I love Jack but sometimes he acts and looks like a pompous villain in a high school movie
Man, watching that OT goal again - Dunleavy really was bringing it tonight.
"Eichel - carries! - Kane - BURIES! SCORRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRE!"