GDT: #51 ⋅ EDM @ ANA ⋅ 7 PM PST

Status
Not open for further replies.

Hockey Duckie

Registered User
Jul 25, 2003
17,565
12,473
southern cal
Terry had 10 points in the previous 6 games.
Henrique had 9.
Carlsson had 4.
Vatrano had 3.
Strome had 1.
“Salvage Terry” isn’t really the way I’d put it.

Logical fallacy on "Salvaging Terry". If you're using the previous 6 games, of course it's a wrong terminology, but you're fixated on white knighting again because the context is our last game and only our last game.

Last game: Groulx -4, Terry -4.

Please use the correct context if you're going to correct someone.
 

Ducks DVM

sowcufucakky
Jun 6, 2010
52,121
29,306
Long Beach, CA
Logical fallacy on "Salvaging Terry". If you're using the previous 6 games, of course it's a wrong terminology, but you're fixated on white knighting again because the context is our last game and only our last game.

Last game: Groulx -4, Terry -4.

Please use the correct context if you're going to correct someone.
Disagreeing with you isn’t white knighting. +/- is a worthless to misleading stat and you know it. Groulx is the reason that line wasn’t able to perform. Terry has been putting up points in spite of Groulx, not because of him. Swapping out Groulx would be supporting Terry, not salvaging him.

Please use the correct terminology if you’re going to correct someone.
 
Last edited:

Hey234

Registered User
Sponsor
May 7, 2010
732
879
Southern California
The team played hard and deserved at least OT. Overcoming the injuries this season has been really tough. Lots of positive vibes for the future. Just have to be patient.

Also, the calls/no calls by the refs this season are truly mystifying. Very clearly impacted the game negatively for the Ducks. The consistency of mistakes made by refs benefitting the other team seems overwhelming disproportionate.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad