Post-Game Talk: #42 | Capitals at Flyers | January 11, 2023

blackjackmulligan

Registered User
Jun 17, 2022
2,625
1,059
He might well be moveable with $500K retained, there are teams that want that edge.
I don't think the idea of Deslauriers was bad, 4 years of Deslauriers was bad.
He did bring an edge to the forecheck that rubbed off the younger players, and provided a security blanket for them.

But bench him for a month and I'm sure he'll waive his NTC.
It was a market value deal you forgot to mention......
 

deadhead

Registered User
Feb 26, 2014
49,215
21,617
Not only is the idea of Deslauriers bad, the execution is bad.


A complete void on offense in a league steering towards offense is bad. It's a dumb idea. Filling the obsolete goon role is a dumb idea. They do nothing.


There is no move that will not be defended.
Actually, the league isn't steering toward offense, that trend has probably peaked,
There was a jump due to changes in goalie equipment, then changes in rule enforcement that favored smaller, skilled players.

1974-1992 scoring was much higher than today.
crashed to 2.63 per game in 1996-97, reached 3.08 in 2005-06, then below 2.8 from 2010-2018.
Last five seasons: 3.01, 3.02, 2.94, 3.14, 3.18.

Checking, goaltending are still key to winning.
What has changed is the really slow players are mostly gone (L Schenn survived the asteroid for some reason).
But there's still a limited supply of skilled players.
 

dragonoffrost

It'll be a cold day...
Sponsor
Feb 15, 2019
8,767
9,754
Hell
What the hell does this mean? The idea of Deslauriers. He's as useless in year one as he will be in years two, three, and four. And he always would have been. The idea of Deslauriers. They didn't need to go to imaginationland to figure out what he was, he's a real live (quasi-) NHL player with hundreds of games to look at for reference. The idea.

And man, if the team needed f***ing Deslauriers to teach the youngsters how to forecheck, the entire hockey operations staff should be deepthroating shotgun barrels.
 

Beef Invictus

Revolutionary Positivity
Dec 21, 2009
128,108
166,055
Armored Train
Actually, the league isn't steering toward offense, that trend has probably peaked,
There was a jump due to changes in goalie equipment, then changes in rule enforcement that favored smaller, skilled players.

1974-1992 scoring was much higher than today.
crashed to 2.63 per game in 1996-97, reached 3.08 in 2005-06, then below 2.8 from 2010-2018.
Last five seasons: 3.01, 3.02, 2.94, 3.14, 3.18.

Checking, goaltending are still key to winning.
What has changed is the really slow players are mostly gone (L Schenn survived the asteroid for some reason).
But there's still a limited supply of skilled players.

Changes to rules at lower and higher levels have ended the big hit era. Instead of spending all their time protecting themselves as youths, players can actually grow skills and take risks without fear of having someone try to cave in their skull. The players who most benefit from that trend are just beginning to enter the league. This trend is just beginning. The Flyers are going backwards instead.

There is not going to be any sudden regression wherein Deslauriers becomes a good idea. This pronouncement will age as well as your proclamation that slapshots are obsolete and have no place in the game.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ironmanrulez

Curufinwe

Registered User
Feb 28, 2013
55,812
42,896
Reminder that if the Fletcher hadn't signed Deslauriers for 4 x $1.75m and promised him he would play 82 games if healthy, he could have claimed Martinook's 2 x $1.8m contract on waivers before the season started.


Martinook has 20 points, all ES, in 41 games.
 

blackjackmulligan

Registered User
Jun 17, 2022
2,625
1,059
Changes to rules at lower and higher levels have ended the big hit era. Instead of spending all their time protecting themselves as youths, players can actually grow skills and take risks without fear of having someone try to cave in their skull. The players who most benefit from that trend are just beginning to enter the league. This trend is just beginning. The Flyers are going backwards instead.

There is not going to be any sudden regression wherein Deslauriers becomes a good idea. This pronouncement will age as well as your proclamation that slapshots are obsolete and have no place in the game.
miss those days at rizzo rink.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Cody Webster

wasup

Registered User
Mar 21, 2018
2,471
2,315
Every win sets this team back that much more, and I'm not talking about draft picks
Winning 5-7 more games ain't the difference between getting a house cleaning or not . I'm not happy with management either but I don't get worked up about it . The young guys look good and I mean all of them . Frost Tipper York Allison Hart Cates Ersson all look like keepers and do believe Laczynski will replace Brown once he is back but do expect him to be sent down first to regain conditioning since with lower body injury he will have to start from zero again .

I'm being entertained a lot more this year than last so at least there is that .
 

wasup

Registered User
Mar 21, 2018
2,471
2,315
You must love being a middling team and little chance of being a multiple cup winner in a market that shouldn't have challenges. This team used to be a destination for players to want to be here and not just players from this area. Now it's just another team.
It's called a salary cap , have you heard of it ?
 
  • Haha
Reactions: kudymen

Columbus Hockey Dad

Registered User
Oct 30, 2018
1,043
1,501
I'm torn. My head knows that we need to lose every game possible to get the best pick in the first round we possibly can. BUT, seeing the team slowly start to become less than dogshit and actually get competitive is a nice thing...particularly seeing it happen because of the improvement of the kids. That said, we obviously still need to be sellers with a minimum of JVR, Provorov, and Hayes moved. We also need to yield a return of hopefully 1st/2nd round picks in THIS draft. But it's hard to root against a young team that gives it everything they have every night. Some of you are better at this than I am.
 

deadhead

Registered User
Feb 26, 2014
49,215
21,617
Flyers were one of the smallest, softest teams in the NHL the last couple years.
And yes, it matters, look at the top teams, Washington, Boston, Vegas, etc.
So yeah, Deslauriers made sense in a transition season, on a one year deal. Change the mindset ("we're not gonna take it . . .")

I didn't like the 4 year deal at the time, it's just not that expensive, you can bury it for $500K. But made no sense.
 

Beef Invictus

Revolutionary Positivity
Dec 21, 2009
128,108
166,055
Armored Train
Flyers were one of the smallest, softest teams in the NHL the last couple years.
And yes, it matters, look at the top teams, Washington, Boston, Vegas, etc.
So yeah, Deslauriers made sense in a transition season, on a one year deal. Change the mindset ("we're not gonna take it . . .")

I didn't like the 4 year deal at the time, it's just not that expensive, you can bury it for $500K. But made no sense.

Size doesn't matter as much as ability to play hockey. Having a big player who sucks ass is always worse than having a better small player. Always.
 

Beef Invictus

Revolutionary Positivity
Dec 21, 2009
128,108
166,055
Armored Train
And imagine insisting the Flyers don't overvalue size for its own sake over actual ability while defending the Deslauriers signing that does exactly that. Legendary lack of awareness.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ironmanrulez

deadhead

Registered User
Feb 26, 2014
49,215
21,617
Changes to rules at lower and higher levels have ended the big hit era. Instead of spending all their time protecting themselves as youths, players can actually grow skills and take risks without fear of having someone try to cave in their skull. The players who most benefit from that trend are just beginning to enter the league. This trend is just beginning. The Flyers are going backwards instead.

There is not going to be any sudden regression wherein Deslauriers becomes a good idea. This pronouncement will age as well as your proclamation that slapshots are obsolete and have no place in the game.
This is fantasy. There are plenty of big hits, just no more head hunting. Guys like NAK get suspended for throwing elbows.

What benefited smaller players wasn't eliminating fighting, but cutting down on grabbing, hooking, slashing and interference.
That let them skate unimpeded (or at least with less contact than before).

In response the league has gotten faster (and slightly lighter, by about 5 lbs), which means the windows are smaller, forecheckers are faster so D-men have less time and have to win board battles to maintain possession. Checking lines have fewer 220 lb forwards, but more 200 lb players with above average speed.

In the future, as overall speed increases, skilled smurfs will have less of a competitive advantage as bigger players can still check them and lean on them, but there will be less room to skate. Bigger players also have a wider stick radius to break up plays with the speed to get to spots where they can block and harass smurfs.

Eventually, like all evolutionary battles, the league will come to a new equilibrium.
 

Rich Nixon

No Prior Knowledge of "Flyers"
Jul 11, 2006
15,000
19,045
Key Biscayne
Reminder that if the Fletcher hadn't signed Deslauriers for 4 x $1.75m and promised him he would play 82 games if healthy, he could have claimed Martinook's 2 x $1.8m contract on waivers before the season started.


Martinook has 20 points, all ES, in 41 games.

There are so many moneyball type guys out there that they could've grabbed up if they weren't busy stacking idiots until they reached the contract limit. Imagine you just don't sign Deslauriers or nab Bellows on waivers or ink any of the wasted minor league fodder like Belpedio, and instead grab Matrinook, Milano, and Tolvanen. Those are all top-9 NHL forwards for free. They exist and you can get them every year if you go looking. Worst case they're padding stats on a bad team until they become deadline flips. Free assets!

Now, they need centers more than anything, but.

This is fantasy. There are plenty of big hits, just no more head hunting. Guys like NAK get suspended for throwing elbows.

What benefited smaller players wasn't eliminating fighting, but cutting down on grabbing, hooking, slashing and interference.
That let them skate unimpeded (or at least with less contact than before).

In response the league has gotten faster (and slightly lighter, by about 5 lbs), which means the windows are smaller, forecheckers are faster so D-men have less time and have to win board battles to maintain possession. Checking lines have fewer 220 lb forwards, but more 200 lb players with above average speed.

In the future, as overall speed increases, skilled smurfs will have less of a competitive advantage as bigger players can still check them and lean on them, but there will be less room to skate. Bigger players also have a wider stick radius to break up plays with the speed to get to spots where they can block and harass smurfs.

Eventually, like all evolutionary battles, the league will come to a new equilibrium.

OK, let me get this straight:

The trend went from big and tuff to speed and skill. Now the skill and speed guys are getting bigger (or, the bigger guys are getting speedier and, uh, "skillier"). So little skilled guys will be less advantageous.

Given that the guy has no f***ing speed or skill to speak of, how does any of this have anything to do with our discussion of Deslauriers?
 
Last edited:

deadhead

Registered User
Feb 26, 2014
49,215
21,617
OK, let me get this straight:

The trend went from big and tuff to speed and skill. Now the skill and speed guys are getting bigger (or, the bigger guys are getting speedier and, uh, "skillier"). So little skilled guys will be less advantageous.

Given that the guy has no f***ing speed or skill to speak of, how does any of this have anything to do with our discussion of Deslauriers?
Desluariers should have been a one year deal to add some grit to a soft team and protect a bunch of kids.
In that context it made sense for a rebuilding team.
Maybe even move him at the TDL for a team that wants some toughness going into the playoffs.

Briere can appreciate the value of a "bodyguard." Even in today's NHL.

Like I said at the time, the 4 year deal made no sense. But it's not that hard to bury.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad