MiamiScreamingEagles
Global Moderator
- Jan 17, 2004
- 71,291
- 48,243
If AV gets fired I have no doubt one of them becomes interim HC. It's the flyers way.It could be Michel and Yeo are still here cause AV is the real boss.
Vladar has been good but will he play both games?
For as bad as things have been here the Bruins have been vulnerable too
back when we didn't have a full roster they killed us.This is going to be bad. The bruins are going to wipe the floor with this scrub team, just like in the beginning of the season.
Unless its a false positive and Halak can be back and play tomorrow Swayman would start, probably our top prospect but this is his first pro year and he hasnt played in NHL yet.
ya i think this team just needs a massive reset in the summer with practise, preparation, and hopefully some new system/structure from AV. A top 4 d would help braun settle into a lesser role, help stabilize the defense, help the pk, etc. Im with deadhead on this. Allison can help the depth too but i think we might be stuck with jvr and voracek. Laughton I think is gone to seattleOne solid RHD solidifies our defensive rotation, with the top four set, we're looking at York, Braun, Morin and maybe Ghost as the 3rd pair. That's a top flight defense. Sanheim and Myers may have struggled at times this year, but the talent is obvious, D-men have ups and downs early in their careers.
The forward group is deep and getting deeper, even if they lose Laughton, Raffl and one of JVR/Voracek:
G - Couts - TK
Lindblom - Hayes - Farabee
JVR - Frost - Patrick
Wisdom - Laczynski - NAK
that's not a bad front 12, or replace Wisdom with Allison and move Farabee to LW. Or Foerster. Or Willman, if you want more speed.
Upgrade Elliott with a better veteran goalie, bring Ersson over to LHV and you have real depth at goalie.
ya i think this team just needs a massive reset in the summer with practise, preparation, and hopefully some new system/structure from AV. A top 4 d would help braun settle into a lesser role, help stabilize the defense, help the pk, etc. Im with deadhead on this. Allison can help the depth too but i think we might be stuck with jvr and voracek. Laughton I think is gone to seattle
ya i think this team just needs a massive reset in the summer with practise, preparation, and hopefully some new system/structure from AV. A top 4 d would help braun settle into a lesser role, help stabilize the defense, help the pk, etc. Im with deadhead on this. Allison can help the depth too but i think we might be stuck with jvr and voracek. Laughton I think is gone to seattle
if laughton is gone, then i realistically see them taking hagg. No one else really unless they really want to take on salary. I feel like we will protect jvr instead of voracek given the season but idk. Seattle can pick up other 4-5 million contracts instead of an 8million one from voracek to meet the cap.Another reason we should trade Laughton. Forces Seattle to take a different player from us.
what would be a good return for laughton? I would like prospects instead of picks given scouting issues this yearAnother reason we should trade Laughton. Forces Seattle to take a different player from us.
if laughton is gone, then i realistically see them taking hagg. No one else really unless they really want to take on salary. I feel like we will protect jvr instead of voracek given the season but idk. Seattle can pick up other 4-5 million contracts instead of an 8million one from voracek to meet the cap.
I would not lose a day of sleep if we lost laughton and hagg
what would be a good return for laughton? I would like prospects instead of picks given scouting issues this year
1st rounder isn’t out of the question. I just can’t see a team doing it. I’d assume something along the lines of either a 2nd + 4th or some RHD overvalued vet that has intangibles.I want a top 40 pick at least. Others will tell you two 2nds or 2nd + B prospect.
i think a gm would value hagg over nak tbh. We don't, but dinosaurs do.Hagg? Are you high? Lol
Even if they wanted to pick a cheap player from us, they'd surely go with Aube-Kubel over Hagg.
i think a gm would value hagg over nak tbh. We don't, but dinosaurs do.
Hagg? Are you high? Lol
Even if they wanted to pick a cheap player from us, they'd surely go with Aube-Kubel over Hagg.
What is a Bruins fan doing in the Flyers gdt?Unless its a false positive and Halak can be back and play tomorrow Swayman would start, probably our top prospect but this is his first pro year and he hasnt played in NHL yet.
they should just take voracek and we should just sign hamilton after then lolll. They will much better options than both nak and hagg via other teams.The Flyers have employed a lot of slugs that never played an NHL game after leaving here. Hagg will be no different. He has 0 value. Especially for a team like Seattle that is already placing a heavy emphasis on analytics.
https://thehockeywriters.com/seattle-kraken-analytics-namita-nandakumar/
that was a bruins fan?? im on it bossWhat is a Bruins fan doing in the Flyers gdt?
Could go a long way because the Bruins put this playoff race away if they win any one of the three games this weekUnless its a false positive and Halak can be back and play tomorrow Swayman would start, probably our top prospect but this is his first pro year and he hasnt played in NHL yet.
I'm willing to live with it. Tired of bringing on veterans who don't move the needleFor years the cry was "play the prospects, don't block them with mediocre veterans."
They play the prospects. "They suck!"
Yeah, what do you think happens when you play a lot of young players? They make mistakes. Live with it.
What is a Bruins fan doing in the Flyers gdt?
how dare you. He is one of us!! I REPEAT:what’s a Hurricane fan doing here?
For years the cry was "play the prospects, don't block them with mediocre veterans."
They play the prospects. "They suck!"
Yeah, what do you think happens when you play a lot of young players? They make mistakes. Live with it.
anything to take the blame off the coaching staff is my guessWhat's that have anything to do with the current situation or the current discussion?
Not sure why you're bringing up irrelevant talking points.