Edmonton is obviously always on the table, though they don't really have a realistic asset I'm intrigued by other than that potential top 10 pick. Montreal is a mess. Their GM might get fired, and if they spend assets on something, it's for a center.
It definitely isn't an easy thing to determine because while every team wants him they have to fit the criteria. We have other quality assets we could add to Simmonds to make things really interesting and not just the basic picks/prospects route, but that's going to have to be an unusual, lucky circumstance. As was said above, top top prospects don't usually get traded.
We've discussed this before but Anaheim makes a world of sense. They're underachieving (but not catastrophically) due to health issues but should still be a contending type team -- or at least in their mind, which is all that matters -- for the next several years. They're out west, love players of his ilk, could use a wing.........depending your feelings of Sam Steel, him + the present 13th pick is a really interesting offer. We'd add a B piece, I'm sure.
I don't think Turris or Duchene have the GM drool effect of Simmonds. It's not rational, but it's only to our benefit. That trade was rather unusual though. Nashville committed robbery; Colorado dinged Duchene's value and had to go for quantity (which they did well on, but we are going quality); and Ottawa was just stupid.
