You've been tanking long enough, it becomes normal. So who knows.
It is what it is. It shouldn't be something to which we say "oh awesome, at least Jack threw his gear around this game after three failed sick breaks last time around"
Leave it alone.
He can vent and show whatever emotions he wants but his play is just as much to blame as that of others whenever the team faces adversity. Eichel is often guilty of casual passes and poor judgment on the PP (dangling the puck at the blueline, tossing rink-wide passes that get easily blocked or picked off because there is no seam or just trying to one-time shots through 4-5 bodies). When things aren't going well, he tries to go solo against 2-3 defenders lined up against his rush. Sometimes he'll try to chase down the puck but whenever he can't outmaneuver through defenses or his passes got intercepted, it seems Eichel lets up and heads to the bench as the opponent rushes up ice. In that regard, I see more effort out of Okposo and ROR in fighting through the adversity - and those two are not as talented as Eichel.
I chalk up a lot of this, and his emotions, to immaturity and growing pains. I hope he finds ways to channel his frustration into energy that leads by example: more hustle at both ends and using his strength and skating more effectively.
Larsson has a dislocated wrist. Will be out for weeks.
Maybe he's pissed because of his own play?
WHO IN THE ROOM IS OKAY WITH THIS?
Come on.
When he didn't show enough passion after scoring a goal, he was criticized for not showing leadership skills and motivating his teammates.
When he gets angry after a poor team performance, he is accused of having a temper tantrum.
Not the same posters obviously, but it's equally obvious he can't win on this one.
yeah I'm sure it wasn't. I'm really ****ing cranky. I apologizeNot disagreeing with you, but that was hardly my point anyway.
We don't know if anybody is okay with it. I would like someone to ask around how they feel about it.
IMO, I'm glad someone has a breaking point for losing and playing poorly. Whether, it's because of him looking at his poor play or just sick of losing, it remains to be seen. A short tweet doesn't help in this matter. To me, it shows some life, which is what I want from a guy who is looked at to help carry the team.
That is as big a loss as O'Reilly IMO - he has been a glue guy that does a lot of little things well that get overlooked in lieu of his stats.
As has been pointed out. It's a false narrative. Schaller wasn't "allowed to leave" to keep Des. Plus schaller wanted to play for Boston. Called it a childhood dream.
Murray should be criticized for not getting a better option than Grant for a 4th line center. Creating a fairytale about Des and Schaller isn't needed to do so.
It's certainly a loss but no it's not as big of a loss as ROR.
The better option for a 4th line center was Schaller. Giving him a one-way (which I think he earned) would have sealed the deal, regardless of his dreams and aspirations to play in Boston. Walking away from Des would have created the cap and roster space to make such a deal more viable. Not sure how that is a false narrative, as opposed to simply offering a variant view regarding Murray's marginal personnel choices.
I'm well aware. Byron is one of the best bottom forwards in the league and probably the best PKer in the league. He would be great on this team. I just couldn't remember if Montreal had dibs before us.Byron was on waivers last season.
Grant makes 50K more than Schaller. So again its a fairytale to suggest Des' deal had anything to do with Schaller not being here.
There are things to get on Murray for (Grant and Des are two of them). But creating a fairytale about Des's signing being why Schaller isn't here is not required to do so.
I'm well aware. Byron is one of the best bottom forwards in the league and probably the best PKer in the league. He would be great on this team. I just couldn't remember if Montreal had dibs before us.
@ Slip
Worry about Gorges and Moulson if you want to be frustrated by contracts that Murray is responsible for that hurt the team. They can't simply be waived to the minors to get rid of their cap hit like Des can.
It's silly to think Schaller is not here because Des was signed; what's not silly is to question Murray's move to let Schaller walk while resigning Des. How does that critique of Murray's tinkering at the margins of the roster amount to a fairy tale?
Truth is I liked what Schaller brought to the table in his limited time last year, and was quite disappointed when he bolted for Boston given that we had zero 4th line center options with Legwand not being resigned. Murray turning around and signing Des to two years of guaranteed money left me with even more questions regarding his decision making process (again, moves at the margins of the roster). Yes, it was never an either/or scenario, just two distinct GM moves that left much to be desired.