Dude you’re blowing this out of proportion again with stupid comparisons. Don’t think the average 100m Olympian runs a hundred in 11.5 sec. Losing one or two face offs more a night is not the end of the world. You like to exaggerate your points without merit. Kinda dishonest. Like someone said earlier, Coyle played with Smith, Haula had Pasta. And f/o don’t matter as much as you seem to think.
Not really. I was using the comp of Coyle vs Haula as an example of the little things we as fans don't normally consider when talking about players and what they do outside of points. You keep minimizing the importance of faceoffs to a silly extent though.
So for this next example, the team goes from Bergeron and his 60% to Coyle and his 48%. Is that a big deal? To you, no, but to the game itself it's a huge drop off. You go from a guy that wins 600 face offs out of a 1,000 to a guy that wins 480 faceoffs out of 1,000. That's a 120 faceoff difference where it goes the other way and countless chances are now swinging back to the other team. That can make all the difference in the world when you're giving extra chances to the other team because of nothing more than a drop off in faceoff winning percentage.
Again you can minimize the importance, but that doesn't make what you say true. Especially in a game like hockey which is predicated on capitalizing on mistakes. And that's just one small factor. Now do it over the rest of their abilities and you see the value of a guy like Bergeron and how hard it will be to actually replace him and his role.